2016
DOI: 10.1039/c6dt02316a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molybdenum dinitrogen complexes facially coordinated by linear tridentate PEP ligands (E = N or P): impact of the central E donor in trans-position to N2

Abstract: The syntheses of molybdenum dinitrogen complexes supported by the tridentate PEP ligands (E = N, P) prPP(Ph)P = (Ph2PCH2CH2CH2)2P(Ph), prPPHP = (Ph2PCH2CH2CH2)2PH, PN(Ph)P = (Ph2PCH2CH2)2N(Ph) and prPN(Ph)P = (Ph2PCH2CH2CH2)2N(Ph) are reported. Together with the coligand dmpm = (CH3)2PCH2P(CH3)2 dinitrogen complexes of the type [Mo(N2)(PEP)(dmpm)] are formed. The new systems are characterized by IR and NMR spectroscopy and compared with the literature-known complex [Mo(N2)(dpepp)(dmpm)] (1) (dpepp = PhP(CH2CH2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The weakest activation of the N 2 ligand is observed in the case of the connectivity isomer L2 , which features a more π‐acidic pivotal phosphine ( trans to the N 2 ). This is in line with the studies of the influence of π‐acidity of the donors trans to molybdenum‐coordinated N 2 by Tuczek et al who reported that when going from purely σ‐donating N‐donor to a slightly π‐acidic P‐donor the N 2 stretch frequency shifts to higher wavenumbers . The effect of the trans ‐effect of nitrogen vs. phosphorus in terms of N 2 activation is also apparent when comparing the IR data for Fe 0 (N 2 )[N(CH 2 CH 2 PPh 2 ) 3 ] ν N2 = 1967 cm –1 vs. Fe 0 (N 2 )[P(CH 2 CH 2 P i Pr 2 ) 3 ] (ν N2 = 1985 cm –1 ) as reported by the groups of George and Zubieta and Field, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The weakest activation of the N 2 ligand is observed in the case of the connectivity isomer L2 , which features a more π‐acidic pivotal phosphine ( trans to the N 2 ). This is in line with the studies of the influence of π‐acidity of the donors trans to molybdenum‐coordinated N 2 by Tuczek et al who reported that when going from purely σ‐donating N‐donor to a slightly π‐acidic P‐donor the N 2 stretch frequency shifts to higher wavenumbers . The effect of the trans ‐effect of nitrogen vs. phosphorus in terms of N 2 activation is also apparent when comparing the IR data for Fe 0 (N 2 )[N(CH 2 CH 2 PPh 2 ) 3 ] ν N2 = 1967 cm –1 vs. Fe 0 (N 2 )[P(CH 2 CH 2 P i Pr 2 ) 3 ] (ν N2 = 1985 cm –1 ) as reported by the groups of George and Zubieta and Field, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Tuczek and co-workers also reported the formation of Me3Al-N2 adduct complexes by the addition of trimethylaluminium to various molybdenum dinitrogen complexes with pentaphosphine ligand environments. 14,32 With regards to borane Lewis acid functionalisation, recent promising work by both Szymczak and Etienne has shown that the addition of boranes to iron or molybdenum/tungsten dinitrogen complexes results in adduct formation of the borane to the dinitrogen ligand, enhancing dinitrogen activation and allowing for further dinitrogen functionalisation by protonation, borylation or silylation. 33,34 We surmised that a similar addition of a strongly Lewis acidic borane could also result in adduct formation at the dinitrogen ligand of 2.…”
Section: Acid Reactivity Of [Mo(n2)(dppm)(np3 Ph )] (2)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of the above-mentioned problemso ft he classic Chatt complexes,w ehad in the past developedaseries of molybdenum dinitrogen complexes in which the trans position is occupied by ad onor atom of am ultidentate ligand.T hese systems were intended to provide only one site for the coordination and reduction of N 2 and avoid all other ligand exchange reactions occurring at the single Mo center. Initially, we had employed ac ombination of at ripodal( 1) [21] or al inear tridentate ligand (2) [22] with ab identate co-ligand (Scheme 4) for this purpose. Compounds 2 and 1,h owever,s uffered from isomerization and, respectively,i nstability of the tridentate phosphine ligand coordinationu pon protonation of the N 2 -complex, which was ascribed to the fact that the trans-donor is not fixed strongly enough to the center Mo atom.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison, n NN of 1 and 2 are by 45 and 50 cm À1 higher, re- Scheme3.Formation of ad inuclear Mo I complex from [Mo(N 2 ) 2 (depe) 2 ]v ia one-electron oxidation, leadingt oaMo IV nitrido complex by dinitrogen cleavage; adapted from Masuda et al [17] Scheme4. [Mo(N 2 )(tdppme)(dmpm)] (1) [21] [Mo(N 2 )(prPPHP)(dmpm)] [22] (2), and [Mo(N 2 )(P 2 Me PP 2 Ph )] (3). [23] spectively.T he activation of N 2 is af unctiono ft he electron density on the Mo 0 center,w hich in turn sensitively depends on the type of phosphine donors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%