2013
DOI: 10.1088/0031-8949/87/04/048103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecules in crystals

Abstract: Hirshfeld surface analysis has developed from the serendipitous discovery of a novel partitioning of the crystal electron density into discrete molecular fragments, to a suite of computational tools used widely for the identification, analysis and discussion of intermolecular interactions in molecular crystals. The relationship between the Hirshfeld surface and very early ideas on the internal structure of crystals is outlined, and applications of Hirshfeld surface analysis are presented for three molecules of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
73
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
3
73
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This arrangement is similart ot hat previously found in Cl@Me 12 BU [6], [2] and I@Pr 12 BU [6]. [3] The interactions between the included anion and the macrocycle can be analyzed through calculation of Hirshfeld surfaces (HSs) [14] with Crysta-lExplorer. [15] As shown in Figure 2, the HSs of the anions mapped with d norm show only four conspicuous red spots (only two of which are seen in the figure,t he others being related to these by inversion) corresponding to contacts shorter than the van der Waals separation with four methine hydrogen [4] and BU [6]studied in this work: allyl 8 BU[4] 1,R= CH 2 CH=CH 2 , m = 0, no TBAX; I@allyl 12 BU[6]·TBA 2, R = CH 2 ÀCH=CH 2 , m = 1, X À = I À ;Cl@allyl 12 BU[6]·TBA 3,R= CH 2 ÀCH=CH 2 , m = 1, X À = Cl À ;Br@allyl 12 BU[6]·TBA 4,R= CH 2 ÀCH=CH 2 , m = 1, X À = Br À ; Cl@Pr 12 BU[6]·TBA 5,R= (CH 2 ) 2 CH 3 , m = 1, X À = Cl À ;Br@Pr 12 BU[6]·TBA 6, R = (CH 2 ) 2 CH 3 , m = 1, X À = Br À ;( OAc) 8 BU[4] 8,R= (CH 2 ) 3 S(CH 2 ) 2 OAc, m = 0, no TBAX,I @(OAc) 12 BU[6]·TBA 9,R= (CH 2 ) 3 S(CH 2 ) 2 OAc, m = 1, X À = I À ;Cl@(OAc) 12 BU [6]·TBA 10,R= (CH 2 ) 3 S(CH 2 ) 2 OAc, m = 1, X À = Cl À ;B r@(OAc) 12 BU[6]·TBA 11,R= (CH 2 ) 3 S(CH 2 ) 2 OAc, m = 1, X À = Br À ;I@(CO 2 Me) 12 BU[6]·TBA 12; R = (CH 2 ) 3 S(CH 2 ) 2 CO 2 Me, m = 1, X À = I À ;Cl@(CO 2 Me) 12 BU[6]·TBA 13, R = (CH 2 ) 3 S(CH 2 ) 2 CO 2 Me, m = 1, X À = Cl À ;B r@(CO 2 Me) 12 atoms (the other methine hydrogen atoms are at distances larger than 3 anda re not involved in interactions stronger than dispersion).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This arrangement is similart ot hat previously found in Cl@Me 12 BU [6], [2] and I@Pr 12 BU [6]. [3] The interactions between the included anion and the macrocycle can be analyzed through calculation of Hirshfeld surfaces (HSs) [14] with Crysta-lExplorer. [15] As shown in Figure 2, the HSs of the anions mapped with d norm show only four conspicuous red spots (only two of which are seen in the figure,t he others being related to these by inversion) corresponding to contacts shorter than the van der Waals separation with four methine hydrogen [4] and BU [6]studied in this work: allyl 8 BU[4] 1,R= CH 2 CH=CH 2 , m = 0, no TBAX; I@allyl 12 BU[6]·TBA 2, R = CH 2 ÀCH=CH 2 , m = 1, X À = I À ;Cl@allyl 12 BU[6]·TBA 3,R= CH 2 ÀCH=CH 2 , m = 1, X À = Cl À ;Br@allyl 12 BU[6]·TBA 4,R= CH 2 ÀCH=CH 2 , m = 1, X À = Br À ; Cl@Pr 12 BU[6]·TBA 5,R= (CH 2 ) 2 CH 3 , m = 1, X À = Cl À ;Br@Pr 12 BU[6]·TBA 6, R = (CH 2 ) 2 CH 3 , m = 1, X À = Br À ;( OAc) 8 BU[4] 8,R= (CH 2 ) 3 S(CH 2 ) 2 OAc, m = 0, no TBAX,I @(OAc) 12 BU[6]·TBA 9,R= (CH 2 ) 3 S(CH 2 ) 2 OAc, m = 1, X À = I À ;Cl@(OAc) 12 BU [6]·TBA 10,R= (CH 2 ) 3 S(CH 2 ) 2 OAc, m = 1, X À = Cl À ;B r@(OAc) 12 BU[6]·TBA 11,R= (CH 2 ) 3 S(CH 2 ) 2 OAc, m = 1, X À = Br À ;I@(CO 2 Me) 12 BU[6]·TBA 12; R = (CH 2 ) 3 S(CH 2 ) 2 CO 2 Me, m = 1, X À = I À ;Cl@(CO 2 Me) 12 BU[6]·TBA 13, R = (CH 2 ) 3 S(CH 2 ) 2 CO 2 Me, m = 1, X À = Cl À ;B r@(CO 2 Me) 12 atoms (the other methine hydrogen atoms are at distances larger than 3 anda re not involved in interactions stronger than dispersion).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…However, when bambusuril 21,c ontaining 1.15 equivalents of TBACl, is titrated by TBAI, as low exchange is observed on the N-CH signal ( Figure S8, Supporting Information). This denotes ac ompetition between guests.B oth signals are assigned to i) bambusuril 21 binding chloride or athioether arm and ii)iodide, respectively.U sing the N-CH 2 signal, also in slow exchange but much closer to the coalescence, it has been deducedt hat iodide is ab etter guest than chloride to bambusuril 21,b ut only by af actor 4( the fit is in accordance with values in the range of [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. We note that this is al esser ratio than that observedi nt he case of allyl 12 BU [6] 17,b earing much smaller arms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The main intermolecular interactions presented in I were analyzed using the Hirshfeld surface 48,49 and the corresponding two-dimensional fingerprint plots. 50,51 In previous work we used this methodology to understand the role of hydrogen bonds in the molecular conformation of a steroid derivative and acylthioureas.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Intermolecular Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall fluorescence intensity (vide infra) can therefore be seen as the net outcome of competing RIM and ACQ processes upon aggregation . In order to visualize the intermolecular interactions in the crystal, normalized contact distances (d norm ) were mapped onto the molecular Hirschfeld surface (Figure ) . As expected, the local minima of d norm are often associated with fluorine substituents involved in weak intermolecular H⋅⋅⋅F bonds (Figure ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%