2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2009.02.068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecularly imprinted polymer for analysis of zidovudine and stavudine in human serum by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(31 reference statements)
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature is lacking in studies involving the use of MIP for extraction of ARVs from human plasma. A typical comparison with other methods reported in the literature using SPE for the determination of 3TC, AZT and EFZ in different matrices is presented in Supporting Information Table 3 , which confirm that LOQ value is appropriate and comparable with other research works. The low LOQs are mainly attributed to the use of highly sensitive, complex and expensive detector, i.e.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The literature is lacking in studies involving the use of MIP for extraction of ARVs from human plasma. A typical comparison with other methods reported in the literature using SPE for the determination of 3TC, AZT and EFZ in different matrices is presented in Supporting Information Table 3 , which confirm that LOQ value is appropriate and comparable with other research works. The low LOQs are mainly attributed to the use of highly sensitive, complex and expensive detector, i.e.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Concerning the number of binding sites (N), the value for MIP 6 throughout the entire affinity range (N = 10.22 lmol g À1 or 1.39 mg g À1 ) lies within the range typically found for non-covalent MIPs (0.1-3.5 mg g À1 ) [55,56]. Furthermore, within the measured concentration window, the number of binding sites for MIPs 3 and 6 are of the same order of magnitude than their control polymers whereas MIPs 1, 2, 4, and 5 have considerable lower capacities (N) compared to the corresponding NIPs.…”
Section: Binding Isothermssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Non-imprinted polymers (NIP 1 to NIP 5), were synthesized following the same procedure as their corresponding MIP except that the template was absent. The five polymers were generated using a ratio 1/4/20,the most common ratio used in the literature [25][26][27][28][29][30][31], between the template, the monomer, and the cross linker. For all the syntheses, the template (1 mmol) and monomer (4 mmol) were first mixed with 1.8 mL of the corresponding porogen in a glass vial the "template-monomer" complex was allowed to form in an ultra-sonication bath for 10 minutes.…”
Section: Synthesis Of Molecularly Imprinted Polymers and Preparation mentioning
confidence: 99%