1965
DOI: 10.1016/0095-8522(65)90010-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular weight distribution of nonionic surfactants: II. Partition coefficients of normal distribution and homogeneous p, t-octylphenoxyethoxy-ethanols (OPE's)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental variation of the partitioning coefficient of the ethoxylated octylphenol between water and tetradecane obeys the expression where "i" is the number of ethylene oxide groups for each oligomer. This result is consistent with the previously published data [2,[11][12][13][14] with a slight difference in the constant that may be attributed to a different branching of the alkylate [12]. For pure octylbenzene oil, the variation of the partition coefficient is found to be quite different from what would be expected by assuming that octylbenzene (EACN = 8) behaved as noctane, which would be only 0.2 unit lower than for tetradecane, i.e., − 3.6 instead of − 3.4 [14].…”
Section: Oligomer Partitioning Versus Oil Nature and Aromaticitysupporting
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The experimental variation of the partitioning coefficient of the ethoxylated octylphenol between water and tetradecane obeys the expression where "i" is the number of ethylene oxide groups for each oligomer. This result is consistent with the previously published data [2,[11][12][13][14] with a slight difference in the constant that may be attributed to a different branching of the alkylate [12]. For pure octylbenzene oil, the variation of the partition coefficient is found to be quite different from what would be expected by assuming that octylbenzene (EACN = 8) behaved as noctane, which would be only 0.2 unit lower than for tetradecane, i.e., − 3.6 instead of − 3.4 [14].…”
Section: Oligomer Partitioning Versus Oil Nature and Aromaticitysupporting
confidence: 96%
“…In such a case, the individual behavior of each of the species is dictated by its partitioning coefficient K, which is defined as the ratio of its concentration in water C w to its concentration in oil C o in the absence of micelles. The K value is experimentally accessible by analytical means either from systems containing pure oligomers or commercial mixtures [2]. Since surfactant mixtures are used in many practical cases, this issue is quite important for formulation purposes, because what really matters as far as the properties are concerned is the composition of the mixture which is adsorbed at interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 shows that the surfactant's predicted partition coefficient agrees with the experimental data within NRMSE of 2.3%. The experimental errors are reported to be expected within AE8% for the partition coefficients [10,39]. Since the deviation in the prediction is smaller than the expected experimental deviations, it is concluded that the experimental error is within the magnitude of the predicted error.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Experimental data from Refs. [10,39]. The Pred (predicted) values were obtained with the modified UNIFAC model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 For pure surfactant, the partitioning is usually characterized by the partitioning coefficient, which is defined as the ratio of monomeric surfactant concentration in oil to that in aqueous phase. 14,16,18,19 Extensive research has been performed on low concentration (typically lower than aqueous critical micelle concentration (cmc)) partitioning of nonionic surfactants. 14,16,17,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] The partitioning research on higher surfactant concentration solutions, however, has been rarely reported and is limited.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%