1977
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.74.3.869
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular weight and valence of the cell-surface receptor for immunoglobulin E.

Abstract: The molecular weight of the active solubilized cell-surface receptor for immunoglobulin E (IgE) was measured in nonionic detergent. The diffusion coefficient was estimated by gel filtration, the partial specific volume was estimated from the differential sedimentation in sucrose gradients prepared from H20 and D20, and the sedimentation constant was estimated from the same centrifugation experiments. receptors were assessed using the (NH4)2SO4 assay described previously (6). Gel Filtration. Gel exclusion chrom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Complete mixing across a 40 μm capillary will occur for even large proteins like IgE (D = 3.3×10 −7 cm 2 /s 37) in less than 50 seconds. This leaves >4 minutes for binding to occur, which should be sufficient to reach equilibrium in a non-competitive assay considering the high affinity aptamers have for their targets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complete mixing across a 40 μm capillary will occur for even large proteins like IgE (D = 3.3×10 −7 cm 2 /s 37) in less than 50 seconds. This leaves >4 minutes for binding to occur, which should be sufficient to reach equilibrium in a non-competitive assay considering the high affinity aptamers have for their targets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Triton X-100 is a mild detergent that does not inhibit protein-protein aggregation (Lang et al, 1980;Pilch & Czech, 1980). This detergent forms a high-M, micelle and binds to membrane proteins in considerable amounts (Clarke, 1975;Newman et al, 1977;Smigel & Fleischer, 1977). The difference is probably due to the amount of detergent bound to proteins and to the existence of other associated proteins in the receptor molecule.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, our further studies were intended principally to see if the component seen on gels in the presence of denaturants might in its native form be a dimer. Our molecular weight studies could not exclude that possibility, since the higher apparent molecular weight for the binding moiety determined in the absence of harsh denaturants (36) could have resulted either from the associated detergent micelles or dimerization of the protein. In addition, we wanted to see whether the receptor was associated with other cellular components either before or after aggregation.…”
Section: Setting the Stagementioning
confidence: 93%