2001
DOI: 10.1139/gen-44-4-549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular variation in plant cell populations evolving in vitro in different physiological contexts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that we obtained four similar but not identical amplification products implies the validity of the method, since amplification products from any contaminants would be identical in sequence. The observed polymorphism was to be expected for a non-coding intervening sequence and it seemed more intense in polypurine and polypyrimidine stretches, in line with previous studies on hypervariable regions [2]. The variability of non-coding chloroplast DNA regions for phylogenetic studies and population genetic analysis is well documented [16].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The fact that we obtained four similar but not identical amplification products implies the validity of the method, since amplification products from any contaminants would be identical in sequence. The observed polymorphism was to be expected for a non-coding intervening sequence and it seemed more intense in polypurine and polypyrimidine stretches, in line with previous studies on hypervariable regions [2]. The variability of non-coding chloroplast DNA regions for phylogenetic studies and population genetic analysis is well documented [16].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…One approach is to examine the genome of regenerants with the use of molecular markers [18]. Hence, it is necessary to apply new approaches to studying the somaclonal variation in plants.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, it is necessary to apply new approaches to studying the somaclonal variation in plants. One approach is to examine the genome of regenerants with the use of molecular markers [18].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Products amplified with primer QR5 from DNAs of R-9 regenerants6,8,18,19, 45, 48, 49, and 56 and the original R-9 mutant (K + ). M, molecular weight marker (100 bp, SibEnzyme).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%