2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2014.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular variability and genetic relationship and structure of Iranian Prunus rootstocks revealed by SSR and AFLP markers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, AMOVA analysis (Table 5) also indicated a low percentage of variation (4.24%) among populations. Similar results could be found in other trees [7,35].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Additionally, AMOVA analysis (Table 5) also indicated a low percentage of variation (4.24%) among populations. Similar results could be found in other trees [7,35].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Most of such phylogenetic trees are unable to display some parameters, such as horizontal gene transfer, hybridization, and recombination [29]. As a result, phylogenetic networks (NNet) analysis was used to explain visualized conflicting signals in the data sets, whether they arise from sampling error or genuine recombination [40,41]. The NNet analysis categorized the cultivars into two groups, which again show the territoriality (Figure 1B).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rapid development of technology and the accompanying needs, the facilities of the laboratories where the applications will occur, the biological properties of the species and the abundance of markers in the genome have contributed to the development of DNA markers [5]. Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), randomly amplified polymorphic DNA markers (RAPD), amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), sequence labeled sequences (STS), microsatellites (SSR), cleaved polymorphic sequence (CAPS), single strand such as complementary polymorphism (SSCP), amplicon length polymorphism (ALP), interspecific sequence repeat polymorphism (ISSR), expressed sequence tags (EST) and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) [1,[6][7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Molecular Marker Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular marker techniques have some advantages and disadvantages as compared to each other, but their reasons for preference vary according to the purpose of the study and the technical possibilities of the laboratory in which the study will be conducted. SSR and SNP markers are frequently preferred because of the high level of polymorphism nowadays [11,12].…”
Section: Molecular Marker Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%