2014
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00372-14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Tools for Diagnosis of Visceral Leishmaniasis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy

Abstract: e Molecular methods have been proposed as highly sensitive tools for the detection of Leishmania parasites in visceral leishmaniasis (VL) patients. Here, we evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of these tools in a meta-analysis of the published literature. The selection criteria were original studies that evaluate the sensitivities and specificities of molecular tests for diagnosis of VL, adequate classification of study participants, and the absolute numbers of true positives and negatives derivable from the data… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
100
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
100
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These tests, along with standard polymerase chain reaction, are able to detect circulating DNA in the blood of individuals who are actively infected. Studies show that molecular tests are very sensitive, and although they have low specificity, it may be that these are infections that are below the limit of detection of the reference standard, and therefore in fact true positives 4 . Diagnostics that are able to detect asymptomatic infection and PKDL may also be important, depending on the relative role of transmission in these groups.…”
Section: Diagnostics Of the Futurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These tests, along with standard polymerase chain reaction, are able to detect circulating DNA in the blood of individuals who are actively infected. Studies show that molecular tests are very sensitive, and although they have low specificity, it may be that these are infections that are below the limit of detection of the reference standard, and therefore in fact true positives 4 . Diagnostics that are able to detect asymptomatic infection and PKDL may also be important, depending on the relative role of transmission in these groups.…”
Section: Diagnostics Of the Futurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This definition is used partly because of the low specificity of the rK39 test to identify infection rather than exposure, and to differentiate kala-azar from other fever-causing aetiologies. For the control of kala-azar, it has been proposed that a diagnostic test that detects active infection rather than the immune response to infection could be used 4 . Testing earlier could identify more patients and interrupt transmission by early treatment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the procedure is invasive, and its sensitivity is 77% 3 . Molecular diagnosis using standard polymerase chain reaction (PCR) may be less invasive than parasitological examination of bone marrow, as it presents high performance in whole blood (sensitivity of 93.1% and specificity of 95.6%), according to a meta-analysis study by Ruiter et al 7 . However, it also requires a complex infrastructure and specialized professionals and, thus, the technique is restricted to reference centres.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Causes of false-negative diagnosis may be low parasite load, lack of a well-trained expert to identify the parasites, and delayed diagnosis. [7][8][9] Another limitation of microscopic methods is the identification of species of the causal agent, which is not possible for leishmaniasis and Chagas disease but possible for malaria, despite high error rates. 10 Other diagnostic methods have improved aggregate sensitivity and specificity relative to conventional techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%