2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular testing in stage I–III non-small cell lung cancer: Approaches and challenges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such testing is currently not routine, but this discussion should undoubtedly be addressed by global organizations as well. 25 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such testing is currently not routine, but this discussion should undoubtedly be addressed by global organizations as well. 25 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, their only treatment options were targeted therapy or immunotherapy. In this way, liquid biopsy, as a noninvasive, safe, and easy procedure, has the potential to improve the currently used strategies for lung cancer diagnosis and treatment, either alone or as complementary data for imaging findings in this type of patient [ 32 ]. Nevertheless, further studies in this direction are needed to make the use of liquid biopsy in this setting a reality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods are used to identify these molecular alterations, by analyzing protein expression levels using immunohistochemistry (IHC), by assessing mutations in tumor DNA, and by assessing the fusion of certain genes of interest (i.e., ALK , ROS1 , NTRK , RET ) using IHC and notably fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) [ 15 ]. A reference method for the study of mutations in tumor DNA was historically Sanger sequencing, described in 1977, which has been superseded by the routine use of real-time PCR (qPCR) [ 20 ]. A still commonly used strategy is based on sequential exclusion testing looking for mutations that are mutually exclusive with others or using hotspot screening to search for exploitable molecular alterations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A still commonly used strategy is based on sequential exclusion testing looking for mutations that are mutually exclusive with others or using hotspot screening to search for exploitable molecular alterations. In contrast, next-generation sequencing (NGS) allows for broad molecular profiling and allows for the simultaneous detection of both common targetable and rare mutations at the tumor DNA level and are able to identify translocations at the RNA level [ 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%