2009
DOI: 10.1021/ma8026996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Tensile Testing Machines: Breaking a Specific Covalent Bond by Adsorption-Induced Tension in Brushlike Macromolecules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
91
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
91
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a proofof-concept study, we demonstrated selective scission of disulfide bonds (S-S) incorporated into the middle of a bottlebrush backbone although S-C, C-O and C-C bonds remained intact or their scission rate was much slower (Fig. 10a), because the bond dissociation energy of the S-S bond is lower [45]. Even if the force is not large enough to break the S-S bond, it can accelerate the reduction of the S-S bond by dithiothreitol (DTT) [4].…”
Section: Molecular Bottlebrushesmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a proofof-concept study, we demonstrated selective scission of disulfide bonds (S-S) incorporated into the middle of a bottlebrush backbone although S-C, C-O and C-C bonds remained intact or their scission rate was much slower (Fig. 10a), because the bond dissociation energy of the S-S bond is lower [45]. Even if the force is not large enough to break the S-S bond, it can accelerate the reduction of the S-S bond by dithiothreitol (DTT) [4].…”
Section: Molecular Bottlebrushesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…These advances in materials engineering do not dismiss the traditional challenges in fundamentals of mechanochemistry related to understanding the transduction of macroscopic strain to individual bonds. In addition to conventional mechanochemistry tools (grinding, ultrasonic irradiation, and elongational flows), advanced techniques, such as optical tweezers [36], magnetic tweezers [37,38], atomic force microscopy (AFM)-based force spectroscopy [39][40][41], micro-needle manipulation [42], biomembrane force probes [43], and targeted incorporation of mechanophores [44][45][46], have been developed to control forces on a single-molecule scale. Simultaneously, theoretical frameworks for mechanochemistry undergo continuous development, from early work by Eyring [47], Kramers [48], Zhurkov [49], and Bell [50] to more recent fundamental studies by Evans [51], Klein [52], Beyer [53], Hummer [54], Dudko [55], Marx [56], Martinez [8], and many others reviewed in [57].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, polymer brush, defined as a one-dimensional brush possessing densely grafted side chains on a linear polymer main chain or solid surfaces, has attracted much more attention due to their unique properties and several potential applications [1,2], such as high aspect ratio nanowires [3], supersoft elastomers [4], nanotubes and hollowed nanoparticles [5][6][7], photonic crystals [8][9][10], molecular tensile machines [11,12], and nanoporous materials [13,14]. Polymer brush has also been used in the liquid crystal display application for realizing the controllable alignment of liquid crystalline molecules in the devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6 In addition, steric repulsion between the side chains generates significant mechanical tension in the backbone which can be tuned by varying the grafting density, solvent quality, and the side chain length. 7,8 Furthermore, a stable unimolecular micelle of cylindrical shape formed from amphiphilic molecular brush copolymers cannot dissociate in aqueous solution, which is one of the major disadvantages associated with polymer micelles formed from amphiphilic linear polymers. 9,10 Because of their nonspherical macromolecular geometries and lengths up to a few hundred nanometers, brush polymers have afforded numerous potential applications in nanoscience, such as molecular actuators, 11 templates for inorganic particles, 9 and as precursors for nanocapsules, 12 nanotubes, 13 and other carbon nanostructures.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%