2016
DOI: 10.1159/000452138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Targeted Agents for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Status and Future Perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Both the TACE-specific PFS measure we proposed in the TACTICS trial and TTTP are suitable surrogate endpoints for OS. Therefore, either TACE-specific PFS or TTTP may be a useful surrogate endpoint to OS even in registration trials by pharmaceutical companies which combine systemic therapy [21, 22] and TACE.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the TACE-specific PFS measure we proposed in the TACTICS trial and TTTP are suitable surrogate endpoints for OS. Therefore, either TACE-specific PFS or TTTP may be a useful surrogate endpoint to OS even in registration trials by pharmaceutical companies which combine systemic therapy [21, 22] and TACE.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exclusion criterion is tumor infiltration of the main portal vein (Vp4) or inferior vena cava [21]. Positive results of this phase III trial would lead to the worldwide approval of pembrolizumab as a promising treatment option in addition to conventional molecular-targeted agents [22, 23]. However, striking news released by Merck on February 19, 2017 indicate that this trial did not meet its primary endpoint of prolonging PFS or OS compared with placebo plus best supportive care [24].…”
Section: Outline Of the Phase III Trial Design (Keynote-240)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, other molecular-targeted agents superior to sorafenib in efficacy or safety in the first-line treatment of HCC were developed and tested in clinical trials (Table 1) [3]. However, a superiority trial of sunitinib [4] and noninferiority followed by superiority studies of brivanib or linifanib versus sorafenib [5,6] were reported as negative; a superiority trial of sorafenib plus erlotinib versus sorafenib was also unsuccessful [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%