Molecular Systematics of the Cape Parrot (Poicephalus robustus): Implications for Taxonomy and Conservation

Abstract

The taxonomic position of the Cape Parrot (Poicephalus robustus robustus) has been the focus of much debate. A number of authors suggest that the Cape Parrot should be viewed as a distinct species separate from the other two P. robustus subspecies (P. r. fuscicollis and P. r. suahelicus). These recommendations were based on morphological, ecological, and behavioural assessments. In this study we investigated the validity of these recommendations using multilocus DNA analyses. We genotyped 138 specimens from five Poicephalus species (P. cryptoxanthus, P. gulielmi, P. meyeri, P. robustus, and P. rueppellii) using 11 microsatellite loci. Additionally, two mitochondrial (cytochrome oxidase I gene and 16S ribosomal RNA) and one nuclear intron (intron 7 of the β-fibrinogen gene) markers were amplified and sequenced. Bayesian clustering analysis and pairwise FST analysis of microsatellite data identified P. r. robustus as genetically distinct from the other P. robustus subspecies. Phylogenetic and molecular clock analyses on sequence data also supported the microsatellite analyses, placing P. r. robustus in a distinct clade separate from the other P. robustus subspecies. Molecular clock analysis places the most recent common ancestor between P. r. robustus and P. r. fuscicollis / P. r. suahelicus at 2.13 to 2.67 million years ago. Our results all support previous recommendations to elevate the Cape Parrot to species level. This will facilitate better planning and implementation of international and local conservation management strategies for the Cape Parrot.

Birds of different feather flock together - genetic structure of Taiga Bean Goose in Central Scandinavia

“…Even with a pragmatic approach, agreeing on “valid” species can be problematic, especially when novel technologies keep changing the resolution of the taxonomic landscape (Sites and Marshall 2004, Goldstein et al 2005, Johnson et al 2005, Tobias et al 2010, Baetu 2012). Also, strict species-level policies ignore within-species population structures, which are potentially significant for biodiversity conservation (Sullivan et al 2014, Coetzer et al 2015, Peters et al 2016). Increasingly though, below species-level population units are recognised in conservation and management, e.g.…”

Demographic history inferred from genome‐wide data reveals two lineages of sheldgeese endemic to a glacial refugium in the southern Atlantic

“…Numerous examples exist of endangered species that have not been the focus of conservation actions until their taxonomic status has been resolved (e.g. Frankham et al ., ; Coetzer et al ., ). Designating the continental population of C. rubidiceps as a separate taxon from the insular population is thus a critical first step to conserving it.…”

Evolutionary distinctiveness and historical decline in genetic diversity in the Seychelles Black Parrot Coracopsis nigra barklyi

“…Elsewhere, higher levels of nucleotide divergences have been observed between subspecies of Poicephalus parrots from the African continent (an average of 4.5% between Poicephalus robustus robustus vs. Poicephalus r. fuscicollis , and 4.9% between Poicephalus r. robustus vs. Poicephalus r. suahelicus ; Coetzer et al . ). In combination, the molecular phylogenetic and morphological findings from this study, together with observed differences in plumage and behaviour among the subspecies (Rocamora & Skerrett , Asmus ), provide evidence to support the assignment of the Seychelles Black Parrot as an evolutionarily significant unit (ESU), with a recommendation that this island population be managed as if it were a separate species to maintain its unique evolutionary trajectory ( C. n. barklyi is now referred to as C. barklyi by Birdlife International and the IUCN ; del Hoyo et al .…”