2012
DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2011.174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular subtyping of male breast cancer by immunohistochemistry

Abstract: Molecular subtyping of breast cancer by gene expression has proven its significance in females. Immunohistochemical surrogates have been used for this classification, because gene expression profiling is not yet routinely feasible. Male breast cancer is rare and large series are lacking. In this study, we used immunohistochemistry for molecular subtyping of male breast cancer. A total of 134 cases of male breast cancer were immunohistochemically stained on tissue microarrays for estrogen receptor (ER), progest… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

11
102
3
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
11
102
3
6
Order By: Relevance
“…All consecutive cases of surgical breast specimens of invasive male breast cancer from 1986 to 2011 were collected from four different pathology labs in the Netherlands (St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht, and Laboratory for Pathology East Netherlands), as described in more detail previously 1,9 and from three pathology labs in Germany (Paderborn, Cologne, Kassel). Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) slides were reviewed by four experienced observers (PJvD, RK, AM, ML) to confirm the diagnosis and to type and grade according to current standards.…”
Section: Patient Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All consecutive cases of surgical breast specimens of invasive male breast cancer from 1986 to 2011 were collected from four different pathology labs in the Netherlands (St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht, and Laboratory for Pathology East Netherlands), as described in more detail previously 1,9 and from three pathology labs in Germany (Paderborn, Cologne, Kassel). Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) slides were reviewed by four experienced observers (PJvD, RK, AM, ML) to confirm the diagnosis and to type and grade according to current standards.…”
Section: Patient Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For all cases, hormone receptor and HER2 status were reassessed as described previously. 9 Tissue microarray (TMA) slides were used for immunohistochemical staining of ER, PR, and chromogenic in situ hybridization for HER2 assessment, the latter showing HER2 amplification in only five cases (3%). Most tumors were ER positive (131/145; 90%), and PR positivity was also common (97/145; 67%).…”
Section: Patient Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 This group is composed of 134 consecutive cases from 1986 to 2010, collected from four different pathology labs in The Netherlands (St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, n ¼ 28; Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, n ¼ 22; University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, n ¼ 23; and Laboratory for Pathology, East Netherlands, n ¼ 40) and two hospitals in Germany (Paderborn, n ¼ 8 and Cologne, n ¼ 13). The age ranged from 32 to 89 years (average: 66 years).…”
Section: Patient Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,15 Immunohistochemistry Immunohistochemical stainings were performed using tissue microarray (TMA) blocks, which were constructed as described before. 27 In short, hematoxylin-and eosin-(HE) stained slides were used to identify representative tumor areas. From the areas richest in tumor cells, three 0.6-mm punch biopsies from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue blocks were obtained and embedded in a recipient paraffin block, using a precision tissue array instrument (Beecher Instruments, Sun Prairie, WI, USA).…”
Section: Fibrotic Focusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This group of patients was previously used to analyze the molecular sub-typing, fibrotic focus and hypoxia in male breast cancer. 14,15 The patients for whom survival data was not available were excluded in the current study. Age, tumor size and lymph node status were extracted from the pathology reports.…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%