2013
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00473-13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Studies Neglect Apparently Gram-Negative Populations in the Human Gut Microbiota

Abstract: dStudying the relationships between gut microbiota, human health, and diseases is a major challenge that generates contradictory results. Most studies draw conclusions about the gut repertoire using a single biased metagenomics approach. We analyzed 16 different stool samples collected from healthy subjects who were from different areas, had metabolic disorders, were immunocompromised, or were treated with antibiotics at the time of the stool collection. The analyses performed included Gram staining, flow cyto… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Species level was defined with a minimum sequence identity of 98.7% as the best BLAST hit [17]. Second, it has recently been shown that molecular studies overlooked Gram-negative populations as well as minority species [60]. Enteropathogens that can be present with a subdominant status (<10 5 bacteria/mL) may therefore be neglected, adding to the difficulty in achieving clear, reproducible detection [15].…”
Section: Culture-independent Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Species level was defined with a minimum sequence identity of 98.7% as the best BLAST hit [17]. Second, it has recently been shown that molecular studies overlooked Gram-negative populations as well as minority species [60]. Enteropathogens that can be present with a subdominant status (<10 5 bacteria/mL) may therefore be neglected, adding to the difficulty in achieving clear, reproducible detection [15].…”
Section: Culture-independent Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous study, of the 48 species, ϳ50% were detected only by cloning, 20% were identified by both techniques, and 30% were identified only by culture (192). A gap between molecular studies including pyrosequencing of the 16S rRNA gene and direct observation (16) was highlighted by Hugon et al, who emphasized that pyrosequencing neglected nearly 15% of apparently Gram-negative prokaryotes (16). The team of Jeffrey Gordon also demonstrated that culturing of a large repertoire of an individual's gut microbiota by using straightforward anaerobic culturing conditions was possible (193).…”
Section: Culturomics: the Example Of Human Gut Microbiota Historicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, electron microscopy has been used more in bacterial research to observe microorganisms for the first time, to study the structure and function of cells (25), or by environmental microbiologists (26)(27)(28). Bacterial morphologies (29) and cell wall structures can be easily observed, and Gramnegative and Gram-positive types of bacteria can be distinguished (16). Over the past decade, cryo-electron microscopy techniques, which can be divided into cryo-electron tomography (to visualize cell structures at the protein level) (29), single-particle cryo-electron microscopy (the most commonly used) (30), and electron crystallography, are techniques based on cryofixation that emerged from sample preparation steps, which can affect specimens (30).…”
Section: Detection Of Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the variety of factors, this hugely popular concept of gut microbiome research has several flaws. Some studies revealed that microbiome alteration due to diet is largely dependent on genetics [O'Connor et al, 2014] and the analysis technique [Hugon et al, 2013]. Thus, the true diversity of the human gut microbiome remains unknown, and using fecal analyses to estimate the gut microbiome can be a major source of bias in understanding the causal role of the microbiome in human health [Janket et al, 2018].…”
Section: Xylitol Intake and Gut Dysbiosismentioning
confidence: 99%