2007
DOI: 10.1021/jp067176t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Structure of the Chloroform−Water and Dichloromethane−Water Interfaces

Abstract: Using equilibrium molecular dynamics simulations, we investigate the structure of chloroform−water and dichloromethane−water interfaces. These systems are analyzed in terms of the orientation of water, chloroform, and dichloromethane molecules as a function of distance from the Gibbs surface. We also calculate order parameters for all molecules across the interface. The results show that the structures may be described in the context of a few distinct regions of the interface, where organic and water molecules… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
85
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
6
85
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates a preference for the dipole moment to point away from the bulk, similar to the orientation of water molecules next to hydrophobic surfaces found in earlier studies. [66][67][68] The probability density of θ (i.e., the distribution of θ normalized by the cone angle sin θ) in the first layer (0.80 e z e 2.50 nm) and in the bulk (0.55 g z g 2.75 nm) is shown in Figure 6b. A uniform distribution is displayed for the bulk at both temper- Figure 3a) indicates that the major contribution (∼75%) for the large negative heat capacity change of hydrophobic association arises from changes in the reorganization energy between the water molecules.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates a preference for the dipole moment to point away from the bulk, similar to the orientation of water molecules next to hydrophobic surfaces found in earlier studies. [66][67][68] The probability density of θ (i.e., the distribution of θ normalized by the cone angle sin θ) in the first layer (0.80 e z e 2.50 nm) and in the bulk (0.55 g z g 2.75 nm) is shown in Figure 6b. A uniform distribution is displayed for the bulk at both temper- Figure 3a) indicates that the major contribution (∼75%) for the large negative heat capacity change of hydrophobic association arises from changes in the reorganization energy between the water molecules.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our understanding of the complex assembly found in this study is aided by what we have learned over the past decade (10)(11)(12) about the molecular characteristics of this soft interface that guides the adsorption of ions and molecules. We know, for example, that weak bonding interactions between interfacial water and various hydrophobic oils is a general trait for these oil-water systems, resulting in significant molecular orientational ordering and structuring of both phases near the interfacial region (13)(14)(15).…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The interfacial water structure is believed to be similar to that of the water/vapor interface, which is also deemed hydrophobic, except for the weak van der Waals interaction between water and the substance. There are quite a few theoretical studies on hydrophobic interfacial water structure (1,(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18), but not enough experimental work to test the theories.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%