1982
DOI: 10.1021/j100393a009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular structure of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
43
1

Year Published

1982
1982
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(6 reference statements)
6
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2). 26 We have previously shown 27 that this yields well converged results compared to experiment. Diamond is modeled using a C 47 H 60 hydrogen-capped cluster, shown in Fig.…”
Section: Computational Details a Model Systemsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…2). 26 We have previously shown 27 that this yields well converged results compared to experiment. Diamond is modeled using a C 47 H 60 hydrogen-capped cluster, shown in Fig.…”
Section: Computational Details a Model Systemsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The common monoclinic [6,7] and orthorhombic [8] forms both have a crystallographic repeat unit which consists of two molecules, so both groups of ν + and ν − 14 N NQR transitions consist of six lines. The monoclinic TNT is the stable polymorph up to its melting point at 81°C although the metastable orthorhombic form can survive for long periods at ambient temperatures, but it converts to monoclinic near 70°C with a low enthalpy of transformation [7] and can convert slowly at intermediate temperatures.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example they are estimated to be larger than 31 kJ mol -1 in m-chloronitrobenzene [17] [31] have been measured. These values seem to bear little relationship to the C-N bond length; its average values in the two molecules in the monoclinic form of TNT are 147.5 pm [6] and 148.2 pm [8], in the orthorhombic form the average of the two is 147 pm and in gaseous nitrobenzene 146.8 pm [31]. Our values of E a (T 1 ) in Table 3 suggest there is little difference between the ortho and para NO 2 groups in monoclinic TNT since for both the activation energies are close to 90 kJ mol -1 but for orthorhombic TNT, at least for the para group, E a (T 1 ) is somewhat lower at 70 kJ mol -1 .…”
Section: The 14 N Nqr Relaxation Times and Signal Decay Times Of Tntmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An X-ray diffraction study of TNT (5) again revealed the presence of two structures, denoted A and B. 16 The nitro groups were all rotated out of the ring plane, 4-nitro groups by 24˚ and 30˚, respectively, and 2-and 6-nitro groups by 43˚ -60˚. Both intramolecular H-bonding and repulsion of HMPA are expected to diminish or disappear, hence the sizable non-zero values of K eq /H for (5), (6), and (7).…”
Section: 35-trinitrobenzene and Steric Effectsmentioning
confidence: 98%