2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11430-014-4849-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular simulation of the CH4/CO2/H2O adsorption onto the molecular structure of coal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
117
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
5
117
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With domestic and foreign scholars' deep examination of this problem, the adsorption and diffusion process of shale gas and coalbed methane were studied using the average unit structure of organics or organic structure fragments. This has achieved good results for the adsorption and diffusion process of coalbed methane [41,42]. Hu et al used a molecular simulation to research the adsorption and diffusion of CH 4 and CO 2 in coal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With domestic and foreign scholars' deep examination of this problem, the adsorption and diffusion process of shale gas and coalbed methane were studied using the average unit structure of organics or organic structure fragments. This has achieved good results for the adsorption and diffusion process of coalbed methane [41,42]. Hu et al used a molecular simulation to research the adsorption and diffusion of CH 4 and CO 2 in coal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, the suitability of simulation system was usually not discussed before the simulations in the previous studies. Thirdly, the expected bulk gas density, which will be used when calculating the excess adsorption amount, was commonly obtained by the equation of state rather than the simulations111218. However, the difference in bulk gas density obtained by these two methods will induce uncertainties to the excess adsorption amount.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the difference in bulk gas density obtained by these two methods will induce uncertainties to the excess adsorption amount. Fourthly, the excess adsorption amount was conventionally expressed per unit mass of adsorbent1518 to compare with experimental measurements in previous studies. But to the best of our knowledge, the comparability between these two results (simulation and experiment) has to be further discussed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Density Functional Theory may be also used for modeling of adsorption on heterogeneous surface of coal (with Monte Carlo method), and the resultant adsorption energy for CO 2 is about 16.4 kJ/mole . On the other hand, the adsorption energy reported in (Xiang et al 2014), is found to be much higher − 37 kJ/ mole. This might be due to allowance of interactions with surface functional groups, and hence adsorption energy has (2) models, original simulation with optimal parameters for the preliminary assumptions (4) Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…13 Submicropores volume distribution U h (red line-total volume, green bars-normalized distribution) and sorption energy parameters Q bc of CH 3 OH sorption on W42 for MSM parameters determined applying GS (1) and AC (2) models, original simulation with optimal parameters for the preliminary assumptions (4). (Color figure online) analogous value to the water adsorption case (Xiang et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%