Adsorption and Phase Behaviour in Nanochannels and Nanotubes 2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-2481-7_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Simulation of Adsorption of Gases on Nanotubes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 147 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of activity has the computational advantage that in the ideal gas limit it corresponds to the number density, while at intermediate densities it can be related by simple analytical expressions to the pressure. The reader is referred to Müller (2010) for details on the implementation of the simulations. As the pressures examined in this study may be in excess of 10 bar, we have performed a set of additional GCMC simulations at a fixed temperature, spanning the range of activities of interest in a simulation cell without any adsorbent, in order to obtain the relationship between the activity and the pressure, and thus obtain the corresponding average bulk density.…”
Section: Simulation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of activity has the computational advantage that in the ideal gas limit it corresponds to the number density, while at intermediate densities it can be related by simple analytical expressions to the pressure. The reader is referred to Müller (2010) for details on the implementation of the simulations. As the pressures examined in this study may be in excess of 10 bar, we have performed a set of additional GCMC simulations at a fixed temperature, spanning the range of activities of interest in a simulation cell without any adsorbent, in order to obtain the relationship between the activity and the pressure, and thus obtain the corresponding average bulk density.…”
Section: Simulation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…higher electron density and an increased dispersion interaction. However, geometric effects appear to cancel these phenomena, which therefore seem to have little effect on the resulting equilibrium potentials and, as pointed out by Simonyan et al (2001), and also discussed by Müller (2010), by assuming the carbon atoms to be a collection of Lennard-Jones spheres with parameters similar to those used to describe carbon atoms in planar graphene, the fluid-fluid and solid-fluid interaction parameters can be estimated using the classical Lorentz-Berthelot combining rules as explained in the "Carbon Surface Reactivity" section.…”
Section: Carbon Nanotubesmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…To improve the dispersion of CNTs in aqueous solutions and particularly to improve the reactivity of MWCNTs with potential matrix compounds in composite structures, it is necessary to add polar functional groups. There has been much discussion in the literature on the functionalization of SWCNTs; this is only feasible using very controlled reactions involving, for example, either addition or substitution of heteroatoms at specific graphene carbons, otherwise the tube structure is severely compromised (Mawhinney 2000;Rosca et al 2005;Marshall et al 2006).…”
Section: Carbon Nanotubesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the GCMC simulations the temperature and the activity (Mu¨ller, 2010) (which is directly related to the chemical potential) are specified. Simulations are also performed for bulk fluids that would hypothetically be in equilibrium with the adsorbed fluid (i.e.…”
Section: Molecular Simulation Of the Adsorbed Phasementioning
confidence: 99%