1995
DOI: 10.1021/jm00010a007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Similarity from Atomic Electrostatic Multipole Comparisons. Application to Anti-HIV Drugs

Abstract: A procedure is presented for the rapid calculation of the similarity between a pair of molecules based on atomic electrostatic multipole comparison. The multipoles are derived from semiempirical SCF wave functions, and the results obtained compare favorably with ab initio results. The method is illustrated by correlating the similarity and anti-HIV-1 activity of a series of azo compounds. Some generalizations are presented on the structure-activity relationships which are based on the atomic multipole distribu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, while the electrostatic potential is now widely acknowledged as a reactivity index [8,9] and is frequently reported in the literature relating to drug molecules, including some sartans, [1,3] the relevance of first and second electrostatic moments in predicting the binding mechanism in molecular recognition processes has been discussed in only a few cases [10][11][12][13] and never in the case of AII antagonists. Electric moments have the great advantage of being derivable with great accuracy from both theoretical calculations and X-ray diffraction experiments of charge density quality: [9,14] a comparison between the two estimates can reveal fundamental insights, for example, into the charge rearrangement that occurs upon crystallisation, and shows benefits and drawbacks of both methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, while the electrostatic potential is now widely acknowledged as a reactivity index [8,9] and is frequently reported in the literature relating to drug molecules, including some sartans, [1,3] the relevance of first and second electrostatic moments in predicting the binding mechanism in molecular recognition processes has been discussed in only a few cases [10][11][12][13] and never in the case of AII antagonists. Electric moments have the great advantage of being derivable with great accuracy from both theoretical calculations and X-ray diffraction experiments of charge density quality: [9,14] a comparison between the two estimates can reveal fundamental insights, for example, into the charge rearrangement that occurs upon crystallisation, and shows benefits and drawbacks of both methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[33] In this approach, E es is expressed as the sum of promolecule-promolecule, promolecule-deformation and deformation-deformation terms [Eq. (13)], where E pro-pro is the sum of the coulombic interactions between pairs of spherical atomic charge densities and can be determined as a function of their separation, E def-def is the "old" MM electrostatic component of Equation (12) arising from the deformation terms of the molecular charge distribution and E pro-def is the E pen component of Equation (12). The E def-def part was evaluated from the atom-centred multipole expansion up to the hexadecapole-hexadecapole term in the cartesian tensor formulation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the past two decades, researchers have paid a lot of attention to this definition, remarking on its importance for drug design. Other approaches based on similar ideas use electrostatic potential, electron density shape comparisons, or atomic multipole-based similarities . A common feature regarding these proposals is the vagueness concerning how they must be used for comparing submolecular regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other approaches based on similar ideas use electrostatic potential, electron density shape comparisons, 8 or atomic multipole-based similarities. 9 A common feature regarding these proposals is the vagueness concerning how they must be used for comparing submolecular regions. A different approach that is based on the theory of atoms in molecules (AIM) was recently proposed, suggesting a similarity vector space composed of a given molecule's bond critical points (BCPs) as obtained from charge density analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%