2017
DOI: 10.1642/auk-16-103.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular scatology and high-throughput sequencing reveal predominately herbivorous insects in the diets of adult and nestling Western Bluebirds (Sialia mexicana) in California vineyards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
52
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
4
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From our repeat samples we were able to estimate technical repeatability and several measures of biological repeatability (Appendix ). Repeatability of MOTU presence/absence was rather low, consistent with low repeatability estimates found by another study that subsampled avian faecal samples (Jedlicka et al, 2016). An implication is that if the focus of an avian faecal metabarcoding study is on the detection of the presence/absence of a specific taxon, then multiple repeat DNA extractions, amplifications and metabarcoding runs are advisable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From our repeat samples we were able to estimate technical repeatability and several measures of biological repeatability (Appendix ). Repeatability of MOTU presence/absence was rather low, consistent with low repeatability estimates found by another study that subsampled avian faecal samples (Jedlicka et al, 2016). An implication is that if the focus of an avian faecal metabarcoding study is on the detection of the presence/absence of a specific taxon, then multiple repeat DNA extractions, amplifications and metabarcoding runs are advisable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In this study we have demonstrated that faecal metabarcoding can provide a robust and powerful method for assessing passerine diet, allowing greater sample sizes and taxonomic resolution than direct assessment (Betts, 1955). Inclusion of positive and negative controls and repeat samples are part of the standard laboratory practice (Alberdi et al, 2018), although few previous metabarcoding studies have included any of these (but see De Barba et al, 2014; Jedlicka et al, 2016), and have proven invaluable in informing this work. Our protocol yielded fourteen MOTUs for the positive control taxon, suggesting that the 2% divergence rule of thumb used in early barcoding studies to group conspecific COI barcode sequences in Metazoa (Hebert, Cywinska, & Ball, 2003 and http://www.barcodinglife.com) is likely to produce spurious taxa, potentially misleading naïve analyses and underlining the necessity for subsequent quality control steps.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pooling of samples before DNA extraction has been used to reduce processing time and costs by integrating variability among multiple samples or when individual samples were difficult to separate (Burgar et al., ; Clare et al., 2014a, 2014b; Jedlicka, Vo, & Almeida, ), but our results suggest that this strategy may lead to substantial errors in the estimation of dietary descriptors. We found that pools strongly underestimated diet diversity and the frequency of occurrence of prey items, irrespective of sequencing depth, yielding results comparable to those obtained by analysing a single pellet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…This single marker approach has been widely used in many studies (Gordon et al, ; McClenaghan, Nol, & Kerr, ; Moran, Prosser, & Moran, ), but it may produce significant biases due to differential primer affinity for different taxa. For instance, although ZBJ is often used as a ‘universal’ marker for arthropods (Crisol‐Martínez, Moreno‐Moyano, Wormington, Brown, & Stanley, ; Jedlicka, Vo, & Almeida, ; Trevelline, Latta, Marshall, Nuttle, & Porter, ; Trevelline et al, ), it may have strong positive or negative bias depending on the taxa (Clarke, Soubrier, Weyrich, & Cooper, ; Piñol, Mir, Gomez‐Polo, & Agustí, ). The challenge is even worse in the case of omnivorous diets, because the variety of taxonomic clades consumed cannot be analysed using a single marker (De Barba et al, ; Taberlet et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%