1997
DOI: 10.1006/mpev.1996.0383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Relationships between Closely Related Species ofBothriocephalus(Cestoda: Platyhelminthes)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there is still no yardstick for recognizing genus boundaries by using DNA sequence differences, previous studies on the Pseudophyllidea (Verneau et al 1997;Kral'ova et al 2001) have shown the magnitude of interspecific and intergeneric nucleotide differences in the ITS region significantly exceeded the low level of the nucleotide variation between the Ligula and Digamma specimens observed in the present study. The 5¢ end of 28S rDNA for Digramma samples showed a high level of identity to those of Ligula, even in the rapidly evolving D1 domain of 28S rDNA.…”
contrasting
confidence: 64%
“…Although there is still no yardstick for recognizing genus boundaries by using DNA sequence differences, previous studies on the Pseudophyllidea (Verneau et al 1997;Kral'ova et al 2001) have shown the magnitude of interspecific and intergeneric nucleotide differences in the ITS region significantly exceeded the low level of the nucleotide variation between the Ligula and Digamma specimens observed in the present study. The 5¢ end of 28S rDNA for Digramma samples showed a high level of identity to those of Ligula, even in the rapidly evolving D1 domain of 28S rDNA.…”
contrasting
confidence: 64%
“…In a series of studies on the evolutionary relationship of morphologically very similar seven species of Bothriocephalus which infest a large spectrum of marine teleost fish (Pleuronectiformes, Scorpaeniformes and Gadiformes), Verneau et al (1997aVerneau et al ( , 1997b showed that the parasites may not have coevolved with their hosts, although co-evolution has been the most parsimonious explanation for hostparasite assemblages (Brooks, 1979). They interpreted the parasite-host relationship as two different, but non-exclusive, evolutionary processes: (1) sequential colonisations of different host species followed by speciation of the parasites; and (2) a rapid radiation of a ubiquitous ancestral parasite species, leading to the isolation and differentiation of Bothriocephalus lineages in the different host species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%