2012
DOI: 10.1038/nature10742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular recognition of a single sphingolipid species by a protein’s transmembrane domain

Abstract: This is an accepted version of a paper published in Nature. This paper has been peer-reviewed but does not include the final publisher proof-corrections or journal pagination.Citation for the published paper: von Heijne, G., Contreras, X., Ernst, A., Haberkant, P., Björkholm, P. et al. (2012) "Molecular recognition of a single sphingolipid species by a protein's transmembrane domain" Nature, 481 (7382): 525-529 URL: http://dx

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
320
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 347 publications
(342 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
14
320
2
Order By: Relevance
“…One model proposes that some proteins serve as nucleation sites for raft domains by organizing ' shells ' of raft lipids around their membrane spans (Anderson and Jacobson , 2002 ;Sharpe et al , 2010 ). Recent identification of a conserved sphingolipid-binding signature in a variety of membrane proteins (Contreras et al , 2012 ) is consistent with the idea that specific lipids may influence the lateral organization of proteins and vice versa. In addition, there is evidence that electrostatic proteinlipid interactions can generate membrane microdomains enriched in phosphoinositide-4,5-bisphosphate (PIP 2 ) and the SNAP-receptor syntaxin-A1 ( Figure 1C).…”
Section: Microcompartments Within Membranessupporting
confidence: 52%
“…One model proposes that some proteins serve as nucleation sites for raft domains by organizing ' shells ' of raft lipids around their membrane spans (Anderson and Jacobson , 2002 ;Sharpe et al , 2010 ). Recent identification of a conserved sphingolipid-binding signature in a variety of membrane proteins (Contreras et al , 2012 ) is consistent with the idea that specific lipids may influence the lateral organization of proteins and vice versa. In addition, there is evidence that electrostatic proteinlipid interactions can generate membrane microdomains enriched in phosphoinositide-4,5-bisphosphate (PIP 2 ) and the SNAP-receptor syntaxin-A1 ( Figure 1C).…”
Section: Microcompartments Within Membranessupporting
confidence: 52%
“…FLAG-tagged GP 2 and GP 1,2 constructs and variants thereof and ASGR1, as a negative control, were probed for protein-cholesterol interaction in vivo. For this purpose, photoactivatable cholesterol was employed for photolabelling experiments as previously described 66 . In brief, HeLa cells were grown in six-well dishes and transfected using FuGENE HD (1 mg DNA þ 3 ml transfection reagent in 100 ml Opti-MEM (Invitrogen) at B60% confluency.…”
Section: Treatment Of Cells With Mbcd and Cbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These proteins include soluble transporters (e.g., CERT), the S1P GPCRs, and p24, a membrane protein that participates in COPI vesicle formation (Contreras et al 2012). Recent crystallographic studies have illuminated the molecular interactions that enable specific recognition of sphingolipids, revealing hydrophobic binding pockets that can discriminate features such as headgroup structure and acyl chain length (Malinina et al 2004(Malinina et al , 2006Kudo et al 2008;Contreras et al 2012;Hanson et al 2012). Although the above proteins are not known to be homeostatic sensors, such sensors may use similar modes of molecular recognition.…”
Section: Sphingolipid Homeostasis In the Er And Beyondmentioning
confidence: 99%