2011
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1014542108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular recognition and substrate mimicry drive the electron-transfer process between MIA40 and ALR

Abstract: Oxidative protein folding in the mitochondrial intermembrane space requires the transfer of a disulfide bond from MIA40 to the substrate. During this process MIA40 is reduced and regenerated to a functional state through the interaction with the flavin-dependent sulfhydryl oxidase ALR. Here we present the mechanistic basis of ALR-MIA40 interaction at atomic resolution by biochemical and structural analyses of the mitochondrial ALR isoform and its covalent mixed disulfide intermediate with MIA40. This ALR isofo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
121
1
12

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
6
121
1
12
Order By: Relevance
“…As with yeast Erv1 and ALR, mutation of the distal cysteine pair did not abolish the activity of TbERV1 with DTT, but in contrast to Erv1 orthologs from other organisms (30,37), as well as related sulfhydryl oxidases exhibiting a similar core FAD-binding domain Ero1 and Erv2 (38,39), the distal cysteine variant of TbERV1 was also active with TCEP as the substrate for sulfhydryl oxidation. In yeast Erv1, the distal cysteine pair is responsible for electron transfer from the substrate to the proximal cysteine pair and the distal cysteines interact directly with reduced Mia40 (40,41). Small substrates such as DTT, however, can access the active site directly.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As with yeast Erv1 and ALR, mutation of the distal cysteine pair did not abolish the activity of TbERV1 with DTT, but in contrast to Erv1 orthologs from other organisms (30,37), as well as related sulfhydryl oxidases exhibiting a similar core FAD-binding domain Ero1 and Erv2 (38,39), the distal cysteine variant of TbERV1 was also active with TCEP as the substrate for sulfhydryl oxidation. In yeast Erv1, the distal cysteine pair is responsible for electron transfer from the substrate to the proximal cysteine pair and the distal cysteines interact directly with reduced Mia40 (40,41). Small substrates such as DTT, however, can access the active site directly.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Does this point toward the possibility that TbERV1 acts directly (i.e., without a Mia40-like partner) in the oxidative folding of small Tim proteins or other cysteine-rich proteins in trypanosome mitochondria (discussed further in references 6 and 8) and that our failure to see direct oxidative folding of recombinant TbTIM9 in vitro by TbERV1 is a consequence of technical limitations? Conceivably, the long, predicted disordered C-terminal domain separating the FAD-binding core helix bundle and distal cysteine pairs in TbERV1 (disorder predicted using the "Regional Order Neural Network" [54]) could guide the interaction with diverse cysteinerich substrates in much the same way the hydrophobic cleft of human Mia40 acts as a receptor for numerous substrates, including the flexible N-terminal domain of the human Erv1 ortholog ALR (40). Further work is needed to test this possibility.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that the two cluster sites are functionally independent and that the M2 motif is not essential in the electron transfer process required for cytosolic Fe/S protein biogenesis. The M2 motif has been previously [9] found to modulate the subcellular localization of anamorsin in the IMS, being imported through the mitochondrial Mia40-dependent disulfide relay system [10,11,43,44]. In such a process, anamorsin is trapped in the IMS through the oxidoreductase Mia40, which specifically forms two disulfide bonds in the M2 motif.…”
Section: Reduced Fl Constructmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upon protein synthesis in the cytosol, the cysteine residues of IMS proteins remain in a reduced state, owing to the reducing properties of the cytosolic environment (11,12). After entering the TOM channel, precursor proteins are specifically recognized by Mia40 protein, and their cysteine residues are oxidized through the cooperative action of Mia40 and Erv1 proteins (7,(13)(14)(15)(16)(17). Mia40 is a receptor, folding catalyst, and disulfide carrier, and the Erv1 protein serves as a sulfhydryl oxidase.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%