2005
DOI: 10.1001/archotol.131.1.10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Profiling of Tumor Progression in Head and Neck Cancer

Abstract: To assess gene expression changes associated with tumor progression in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity.Design: A microarray containing 17 840 complementary DNA clones was used to measure gene expression changes associated with tumor progression in 9 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Samples were taken for analysis from the primary tumor, nodal metastasis, and "normal" mucosa from the patients' oral cavity.Setting: Tertiary care facility.Patients: Nine patients w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
54
0
17

Year Published

2005
2005
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
54
0
17
Order By: Relevance
“…Linear amplification of total RNA and subsequent fluorescent labeling of corresponding cDNA with Cy5 and Cy3 dyes were carried out using the MessageAmp T7 linear amplification kit (Ambion), and cDNA labeling protocols were developed at the AECOM microarray facility (11). Red (Cy5) and green (Cy3) signal intensities for each element on the array were calculated using GenePix Pro 3.0 software (Axon Instruments) package as described previously (11). cDNA arrays consisted of 27,323 sequence-verified human cDNA clones, representing both known genes and expressed sequence tags.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Linear amplification of total RNA and subsequent fluorescent labeling of corresponding cDNA with Cy5 and Cy3 dyes were carried out using the MessageAmp T7 linear amplification kit (Ambion), and cDNA labeling protocols were developed at the AECOM microarray facility (11). Red (Cy5) and green (Cy3) signal intensities for each element on the array were calculated using GenePix Pro 3.0 software (Axon Instruments) package as described previously (11). cDNA arrays consisted of 27,323 sequence-verified human cDNA clones, representing both known genes and expressed sequence tags.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gene expression profiles focused on alterations caused by MTDIA treatment in A549 xenograft tumors, detected with cDNA microarrays of 27,323 clones (11). 125 mRNAs with the greatest changes, defined by a Ͼ3.0 or Ͻ0.33 expression ratios relative to untreated tumors (supplemental Table S3A), represented many different functional categories.…”
Section: Gene Expression In A549 Tumorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linear amplification of primary tumor total RNA and subsequent fluorescent labeling of corresponding cDNA was carried out using the MessageAmp T7 linear amplification kit (Ambion) and cDNA labeling protocols developed at the AECOM Microarray Facility (http://microarray1k.aecom.yu.edu; [11]). In order to optimize differences in gene expression profiles among the individual primary tumors, we first created pools of total RNA for each anatomic site by pooling equal aliquots of total RNA from each of the 12 primary tumors representing that specific site.…”
Section: T7 Linear Amplification Fluorescent Labeling and Hybridizamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has historically been utilized in the identification of differentially expressed genes associated with carcinogenesis [11,14,15]. Drawing from the same patient population as for previous analyses, we selected 12 patients (6 OP cases, 6 LH cases) and utilized the same cDNA microarray technology to compare primary HNSCC tumor RNA (Cy3-green) to normal adjacent mucosa (Cy5-red) from the same patient.…”
Section: Differential Gene Expression Between Primary Hnscc Tumors Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various studies have revealed numerous molecular abnormalities in HNSCC, including activation of oncogenes such as CCND1 (9), EGFR (10), RAS (11) and C-MYC (12); inactivation of tumor suppressor genes such as CDKN2A (p16) (13), TP53 (14), p27 (15) and WAF1/C1P1 (16); expression of angiogenic factors and LOH at numerous chromosomal locations (17,18). For instance, the most frequent cytogenetic alterations in HNSCC are gains of 3q, 8q, 20q, 7q, 11q13 and 5p, and losses in 3p, 9p, 21q, 5q, 13q, 18q and 8p (19). The involved loci correspond to genes that encode specific functional classes of proteins, such as cell cycle regulators, tumor suppressors, cell adhesion and protein kinases (20).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%