2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular prediction of adjuvant cisplatin efficacy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)—validation in two independent cohorts

Abstract: IntroductionEffective predictive biomarkers for selection of patients benefiting from adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are needed. Based on a previously validated methodology, molecular profiles of predicted sensitivity in two patient cohorts are presented.MethodsThe profiles are correlations between in vitro sensitivity to cisplatin and vinorelbine and baseline mRNA expression of the 60 cell lines in the National Cancer Institute panel. An applied clinical samples fil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar DRP for fulvestrant has been shown to predict benefit of fulvestrant in the DBCG cohort and retrospectively in a neoadjuvant trial with fulvestrant (32,47). As the DRP system has previously been found to be predictive in settings with multiple drugs (48,49), this system could then potentially point to which antihormonal treatment would be preferable: fulvestrant or AIs in the first line setting of combinations with CDK4/6 inhibitors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…A similar DRP for fulvestrant has been shown to predict benefit of fulvestrant in the DBCG cohort and retrospectively in a neoadjuvant trial with fulvestrant (32,47). As the DRP system has previously been found to be predictive in settings with multiple drugs (48,49), this system could then potentially point to which antihormonal treatment would be preferable: fulvestrant or AIs in the first line setting of combinations with CDK4/6 inhibitors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Tumour biomarker analysis A novel, tumour-agnostic, molecular biomarker, 2X-121 DRP, was developed to identify responders and non-responders using 61 cell lines as previously described. 21,22 In these tumour cell lines, 414 genes were found to predict response to E7449: 172 genes were found to be positively correlated with sensitivity to E7449, and 242 genes were negatively correlated. Among these 414 genes predictive of the response to E7449, 111 were found to be associated in the literature with DNA damage response or Wnt/βcatenin pathways (Supplementary Table 2).…”
Section: Serum Biomarker Analysismentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Matching baseline transcriptome and growth inhibition data were available for 61 of the 74 cell lines, and were used to develop a DRP as previously described. 21 , 22 Briefly, IC 50 values in the 61 cell lines were correlated to gene-expression levels in the same cell lines; 172 genes with a Pearson correlation above 0.25 were retained as potential markers of sensitivity, while 242 genes with a Pearson correlation below −0.25 were retained as potential markers of resistance. The 414 genes were searched in PubMed for known associations to DNA damage response or Wnt/β-catenin pathways.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Panels that consist of several biomarkers may prove more informative and reflect the complex heterogeneity of tumours. Recently, several gene expression panels have been published that are both prognostic and predictive of benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with NSCLC 13–19. Of these panels, only four13 15 16 18 were derived from genome-wide mRNA expression profiling (GEP).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%