2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1055-7903(02)00450-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular phylogeny of the genus Buteo (Aves: Accipitridae) based on mitochondrial marker sequences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
57
1
25

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
6
57
1
25
Order By: Relevance
“…That is the case in buzzards Buteo spp., where a second highly variable non-coding region, designated the pseudocontrol region by Haring et al (1999), has been found to contain a greater genetic diversity than the CR (Kruckenhauser et al 2004). This region has also been found in other bird species (see Bensch and Hä rlid 2000;Eberhard et al 2001) and it has been successfully used in some molecular studies on raptors (Vä li 2002; Riesing et al 2003). Within this context, our results could be explained by the fact that the CR of Bonelli's eagle -or at least the fragment we have analysed -is not as variable as in other raptors studied to date.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…That is the case in buzzards Buteo spp., where a second highly variable non-coding region, designated the pseudocontrol region by Haring et al (1999), has been found to contain a greater genetic diversity than the CR (Kruckenhauser et al 2004). This region has also been found in other bird species (see Bensch and Hä rlid 2000;Eberhard et al 2001) and it has been successfully used in some molecular studies on raptors (Vä li 2002; Riesing et al 2003). Within this context, our results could be explained by the fact that the CR of Bonelli's eagle -or at least the fragment we have analysed -is not as variable as in other raptors studied to date.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…We therefore generated four different phylogenetic trees based on the interordinal relationships provided in Sibley and Ahlquist (1990), Cracraft et al (2004), Livezey and Zusi (2007), and Hackett et al (2008). Because these studies focused on interordinal and -familial relationships, resolution at the species level was provided by additional sources (Brown and Toft, 1999;Riesing et al, 2003;Griffiths et al, 2004;Wink and Sauer-Gurth, 2004;Lerner and Mindell, 2005;Barrowclough et al, 2006;Wink et al, 2008;Wright et al, 2008). Genera and species not present in these studies were omitted from our phylogenetic tree because incorrect placement of species can result in an increased risk of error in calculating correlation coefficients (Symonds, 2002).…”
Section: Phylogenetic Comparative Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CCR as a molecular marker for phylogenetic and population genetic studies was considered as extremely useful because of its high substitution rate (Väli, 2002;Riesing et al, 2003;Kruckenhauser et al, 2004). In the phylogenetic analyses of the genus Buteo (Riesing et al, 2003;Kruckenhauser et al, 2004), the results based on CCR sequences are in accordance with those from another mt marker sequence (nd6 gene) and the absence of intragenomic homology with the CR (as in the other members of Buteoninae) allows the conclusion that the CCR trees are based on orthologous sequence comparisons. In a CCR-based phylogenetic tree of five Aquila species presented by Väli (2002), only those sections were analyzed, which are present in all the investigated species.…”
Section: Cr and Wcr As Molecular Markersmentioning
confidence: 96%