2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2012.02.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular phylogeny and biogeography of caecilians from Southeast Asia (Amphibia, Gymnophiona, Ichthyophiidae), with special reference to high cryptic species diversity in Sundaland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the only published study of intraspecific caecilian genetics ( Ichthyophis sp. from the Western Ghats of India) suggests that caecilians are not necessarily philopatric [95], although a more recent study from Southeast Asia suggests much higher structuring over a far smaller area [96]. The strong population genetic structure shown in our study, together with the large number of private alleles, is therefore more in line with this and the traditional view of amphibians, and is somewhat extreme given the small size of the island and almost ubiquitous occupancy of this species on São Tomé (RCD, GJM & RES pers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, the only published study of intraspecific caecilian genetics ( Ichthyophis sp. from the Western Ghats of India) suggests that caecilians are not necessarily philopatric [95], although a more recent study from Southeast Asia suggests much higher structuring over a far smaller area [96]. The strong population genetic structure shown in our study, together with the large number of private alleles, is therefore more in line with this and the traditional view of amphibians, and is somewhat extreme given the small size of the island and almost ubiquitous occupancy of this species on São Tomé (RCD, GJM & RES pers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Two reflect the basal split within the Ichthyophiidae (Gower et al 2002) and correspond roughly to groups that have often been treated separately in higher classification because they are morphologically very distinct (e.g. Nussbaum and Wilkinson 1989;Wilkinson and Nussbaum 2006) and which we refer to informally here as the ichthyophiines, comprising all but one species of Ichthyophis (including species of the recently synonymised Caudacaecilia (Nishikawa et al 2012)) and the uraeotyphlines (comprising Ichthyophis bombayensis and all Uraeotyphlus spp.). Because only one species of the newly discovered family Chikilidae (Kamei et al 2012) was available for inclusion in this study, it is included in these analyses with its sister group Herpelidae (Kamei et al 2012).…”
Section: Study Samples and Phylogenymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Caecilians (Gymnophiona), an evolutionarily and morphologically distinct lineage of amphibians, are particularly understudied (but see Zardoya & Meyer 2001;San Mauro et al 2004;Zhang & Wake 2009;Nishikawa et al 2012;Stoelting et al 2014); given their cryptic subterranean lifestyle, there is much to be learned from molecular ecological studies of these elusive tropical amphibians. Likewise, comparatively little molecular ecology work has been conducted on direct-developing amphibians.…”
Section: Future Directions and Critical Knowledge Gapsmentioning
confidence: 99%