1998
DOI: 10.1006/mpev.1998.0518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Phylogenetics at the Felsenstein Zone: Approaching the Strepsiptera Problem Using 5.8S and 28S rDNA Sequences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
51
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We also observed strong support for the other within-and between-order divergences represented in our sample, which are probably mostly Triassic in age. This finding, coupled with the apparent lack of saturation of pairwise divergences across all levels in our study, provides further evidence that this gene is broadly useful for mecopterid phylogenetics, although lineage-specific rate differences are sometimes problematic in this group (Hwang et al, 1998;Carmean and Crespi, 1995). Note.…”
Section: S Rdna Phylogenetic Signal In the Basal Lepidopteramentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also observed strong support for the other within-and between-order divergences represented in our sample, which are probably mostly Triassic in age. This finding, coupled with the apparent lack of saturation of pairwise divergences across all levels in our study, provides further evidence that this gene is broadly useful for mecopterid phylogenetics, although lineage-specific rate differences are sometimes problematic in this group (Hwang et al, 1998;Carmean and Crespi, 1995). Note.…”
Section: S Rdna Phylogenetic Signal In the Basal Lepidopteramentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The basal split within Mecopterida separates the Antliophora, consisting of the orders Diptera (flies), Siphonaptera (fleas), and Mecoptera (scorpionflies), from the Amphiesmenoptera, consisting of the Lepidoptera and the Trichoptera (caddisflies). Recent analyses also place the small parasitic order Strepsiptera in the Mecopterida, as sister group to the Diptera (Chalwatzis et al, 1996;Whiting et al, 1997;Whiting, 1998), but this relationship is controversial (Huelsenbeck, 1998;Hwang et al, 1998). Trichopteran fossils are known from the mid-Triassic (ϳ235 mya; Sukacheva, 1968Sukacheva, , 1973, implying that the Lepidoptera had also arisen by then, although the earliest known fossil lepidopteran is from the lower Jurassic (203 Mya;Whalley, 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Besides the evident morphological oddities, strepsipterans also exhibit other peculiarities at the genetic and molecular level, such as having the smallest nuclear genome recorded among insects (Johnston et al, 2004), unique insertions in the nuclear 18S rRNA (Gillespie et al, 2005) and accelerated rates of molecular evolution in the 18S rRNA gene (Carmean and Crespi, 1995;Huelsenbeck, 1998). Recent studies using both morphological and molecular data (including mitochondrial gene sequences) have generated four contending hypotheses for the phylogenetic placement of the Strepsiptera: as sister to all the holometabolous insects or, within the Holometabola, as part of the Coleoptera, sister-group to the Coleoptera, or sister-group to the Diptera (Kristensen, 1991;Whiting et al, 1997;Huelsenbeck, 1997;Hwang et al, 1998;Rokas et al, 1999;Grimaldi et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found similar results to those from earlier structural alignments although they found Zoraptera grouped with stoneflies (Plecoptera). This analysis included Strepsiptera, which, as in other likelihood analyses of rRNA [157,189] did not group with Diptera, but instead, in this case as sister to an implausible Diptera þ 'Coleoptera' group, with the long-branch Diptera acting as a second internal root that rendered beetles paraphyletic. For the first time since 1997 [77], the molecular data recovered Hymenoptera as sister to the rest of Holometabola (appendix A; Aparaglossata).…”
Section: The Dominance Of Ribosomal Rnamentioning
confidence: 92%