2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10265-019-01109-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular phylogenetic species delimitation in the aquatic genus Ottelia (Hydrocharitaceae) reveals cryptic diversity within a widespread species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, we also suggest that O. balansae should be treated as a variety of O. acuminata . This point has also been put forward by Yu Ito et al (2019). It will also help us have a better understanding of the diversity and evolution of sex evolution in Ottelia .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Besides, we also suggest that O. balansae should be treated as a variety of O. acuminata . This point has also been put forward by Yu Ito et al (2019). It will also help us have a better understanding of the diversity and evolution of sex evolution in Ottelia .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Ottelia Persoon (Hydrocharitaceae) is a pantropic genus with ∼21 species of submerged macrophytes primarily distributed in tropic Africa and southeast Asia, according to the most comprehensive taxonomic revision of the genus (Cook et al, 1983). However, recent studies based on DNA sequence data reveal that two widespread species within the genus, namely Ottelia alismoides (Ito et al, 2019) and O. ulvifolia (Li et al, 2020b), contain cryptic species, suggesting that the alpha taxonomy of Ottelia remains ambiguous. Given that the majority of species within the genus are threatened with local or global extinction (Phillips et al, 2016;Zhang et al, 2017), a credible taxonomy is necessary for conservation and management of extant Ottelia species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent advances in the methodology of coalescent species delimitation have helped reveal cryptic diversity in a wide range of organisms (Fujita et al 2012;Rannala 2015). In plants, multi-locus sequence data of chloroplast and nuclear DNA have been used to test taxonomic boundaries established through morphology-based circumscriptions of species (e.g., Jones et al 2015;Ito et al 2019;Li et al 2020). Here we apply two species delimitation analyses, namely STACEY (Jones 2017) and BPP (Yang 2015), with the aim of assessing the following taxonomic questions central to an improved understanding of the phylogenetic history of Nothapodytes: (i) whether undetected cryptic diversity exists within the widespread N. nimmoniana, and (ii) whether N. amamianus is a valid, genetically distinct taxon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%