2008
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.77.040901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular motors interacting with their own tracks

Abstract: Dynamics of molecular motors that move along linear lattices and interact with them via reversible destruction of specific lattice bonds is investigated theoretically by analyzing exactly solvable discrete-state "burnt-bridge" models. Molecular motors are viewed as diffusing particles that can asymmetrically break or rebuild periodically distributed weak links when passing over them. Our explicit calculations of dynamic properties show that coupling the transport of the unbiased molecular motor with the bridge… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
16
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Active transport occurs when waves of ATP hydrolysis along the track push a passive element much like ocean waves push a surfer toward the shore. Several studies have examined track-induced transport (Antal and Krapivsky, 2005;Artyomov et al, 2008;Morozov, 2007;Saffarian et al, 2006). Here, we discuss directed transport of a Holliday junction along DNA (Lakhanpal and Chou, 2007).…”
Section: Local Target Signalingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Active transport occurs when waves of ATP hydrolysis along the track push a passive element much like ocean waves push a surfer toward the shore. Several studies have examined track-induced transport (Antal and Krapivsky, 2005;Artyomov et al, 2008;Morozov, 2007;Saffarian et al, 2006). Here, we discuss directed transport of a Holliday junction along DNA (Lakhanpal and Chou, 2007).…”
Section: Local Target Signalingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As anticipated, when the recovery probability p 2 → 1 and the presence of bridges has no effect, V → u − w = 0 and D → This phenomenon corresponds to a dynamic transition between unbiased and biased diffusion regimes as was argued earlier in [9]. Figure 3(b) is similar to the corresponding plot in [9] for p 1 = 1 case, but for p 1 = 0.1 the gap is prominent only for small p 2 values, and for p 2 > 0.1 it practically disappears. We note that for p 2 = 0 case in figure 3 (b) the correct c → 0 limit must be D(c → 0) = 2/3 [7].…”
Section: -13mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Namely, comparing p 2 = 0 case [figures 3 (b), 5 (b)] with the result from [7] for u = w = 1 showed the discrepancy in D values of the order of 0.001 for almost entire range of parameters c and p 1 , with the exception of small c 0.02, and p 1 0.01, where discrepancy exceeded 0.008 and 0.006 correspondingly. For figure 4 (b), we compared p 1 = 1 case (not shown) with the corresponding case for u = w = 1 obtained in [9]: typical discrepancy in D values between u = 0.999 and u = 1 cases was ∼ 0.0005 for all c values except c 0.001, where discrepancy exceeded 0.007. As anticipated, when the recovery probability p 2 → 1 and the presence of bridges has no effect, V → u − w = 0 and D → This phenomenon corresponds to a dynamic transition between unbiased and biased diffusion regimes as was argued earlier in [9].…”
Section: -13mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations