2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2007.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular modeling of the myosin-S1(A1) isoform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
35
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
6
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5). This result is consistent with the previously published results of electron microscopy (19), functional mutations (37), cross-linking (30), and molecular modeling (38). In contrast to the ELC-dependent distances in the strongly bound complex, in the weakly bound complex the distance within acto-S1A1 (9.6 ± 0.2 nm) was essentially the same as in acto-S1A2 (9.7 ± 0.2 nm).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…5). This result is consistent with the previously published results of electron microscopy (19), functional mutations (37), cross-linking (30), and molecular modeling (38). In contrast to the ELC-dependent distances in the strongly bound complex, in the weakly bound complex the distance within acto-S1A1 (9.6 ± 0.2 nm) was essentially the same as in acto-S1A2 (9.7 ± 0.2 nm).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…3A, red to green). Such sensitivity to the ionic strength specifies the electrostatic nature of this interaction and mirrors the model-based proposal that a positively charged NTE binds to a cluster of negatively charged residues in the C-terminal region of actin (19). These results clearly show that actin-ANT FRET is sensitive to the association of S1 NTEs with actin and also to ionic strength; both factors are known to be strong modulators of the actinmyosin interaction (19).…”
Section: Actin-ant Fret Biosensorsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…On the other hand, FRET was not affected in the presence of ATP, where S1 binds weakly and is rotationally disordered, and the distance between A1NTE and actin significantly increases compared with that in the strongly bound complex (25,26). FRET of actin-ANT complex was also significantly decreased by an increase in ionic strength (0.1 M KCl), further supporting the similarity between ANT-actin and actin-A1NTE interaction; a structural model of the acto-S1A1 complex (19) shows that the positively charged N terminus of A1 binds to a cluster of negatively charged residues in the C-terminal region of actin (19). Thus, we conclude that our actin- ANT FRET sensor (a) mimics well actin-A1NTE binding, (b) has potential as a platform for the discovery of allosteric modulators of the actin-myosin interaction, and (c) can ultimately help in developing therapies to treat muscle disorders.…”
Section: Validity Of Actin-ant Fret Sensorsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…[38][39][40][41][42] A structural model for this sequence has recently been proposed. 43 For a fairly extended chain with 3.5 Å per residue, there would be a total length of around 95 Å for 27 residues, whereas for a compact α-helical structure the length would be about 40 Å. Taking a plausible structure to be nearer to the extended end of these extremes, as in Ref.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%