2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0925-4005(03)00245-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular modeling of polymer composite–analyte interactions in electronic nose sensors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
53
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, work in classifying the unknown events by functional group and by applying models of sensor-analyte response [12,13] is underway. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, work in classifying the unknown events by functional group and by applying models of sensor-analyte response [12,13] is underway. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selectivity of the material to a particular vapor can be understood by simulation. Shevade et al [77] have used model of polymer-CB composite was in such a way that would describe making the composite in experiment. In experiment sensing films are made by dissolving polymer in a solvent, mixing with carbon black and drop casting into thin film and then evaporation of the solvent.…”
Section: Molecular Modelling To Validate Sensing Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A procedure for construction of the organic molecule-composite is developed and used to investigate the selective sensing property of OPD-CB system. In this work, three works [77][78][79] that have simulation studies on polymer-carbon black composite for sensors have been referred in developing the new procedure. Molecular simulations were carried out using Materials Studio v6.0.0 (Accelyrs Software Inc.) [80].…”
Section: Molecular Modelling To Validate Sensing Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…has shown that the interaction energy of an analyte with the sensor matrix is decreased as water content in the sensor increases; it might therefore be expected that air with lower humidity, 5000 ppm water or RH about 20%, would result in better success rates than air with nominal humidity (about 40% RH) [10,11]. However, the data in Table 4 indicate that this is not the case.…”
Section: Success Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%