2022
DOI: 10.1002/adts.202200274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Modeling of Ionic Liquids: Force‐Field Validation and Thermodynamic Perspective from Large‐Scale Fast‐Growth Solvation Free Energy Calculations

Abstract: In molecular modelling of novel solvents such as ionic liquids, it is common to scale atomic charges to improve the experiment-simulation agreement for some selected properties. As these liquids are designed to solvate solutes, whether the solvation thermodynamics could be correctly described is of utmost importance. Therefore, we present a comprehensive large-scale calculation of solvation free energies via nonequilibrium fast-switching simulations for a spectrum of molecules in ionic liquids, the atomic char… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From hundreds of solvation/partition data, we summarize that the scaling factor of 0.8 serves as a near-optimal solution generally applicable to most ILs [ 59 , 60 ], which is somehow consistent with electrostatic potential (ESP) analysis in isolated and small clusters [ 61 ]. Ion-pair-specific tuning of this parameter could still lead to marginal improvements, and the best solvation/partition-derived charge-scaling parameter is observed to be slightly larger than the density-derived solution [ 59 , 60 ]. Although this slight increase in the scaling factor could degrade the reproduction of the bulk property, it effectively improves the accuracy of solvation and partition thermodynamics and does not overfit a given observable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…From hundreds of solvation/partition data, we summarize that the scaling factor of 0.8 serves as a near-optimal solution generally applicable to most ILs [ 59 , 60 ], which is somehow consistent with electrostatic potential (ESP) analysis in isolated and small clusters [ 61 ]. Ion-pair-specific tuning of this parameter could still lead to marginal improvements, and the best solvation/partition-derived charge-scaling parameter is observed to be slightly larger than the density-derived solution [ 59 , 60 ]. Although this slight increase in the scaling factor could degrade the reproduction of the bulk property, it effectively improves the accuracy of solvation and partition thermodynamics and does not overfit a given observable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…However, in our series of papers benchmarking the charge-scaling issue with large-scaling solvation free-energy calculations and also unbiased simulations of the bulk solvent, this density-matching procedure is found to degrade the reproduction of solvation free energies and water–ILs transfer free-energies [ 59 , 60 ], which is attributed to the overfitting of solvent–solvent interactions for the density-derived solution, while accurate calculation of solvation and partition thermodynamics requires balanced descriptions of solute–solvent and solvent–solvent interactions. Unlike bulk properties (e.g., mass density) that are monotonic with respect to the charge-scaling factor, the non-monotonic dependence of solvation/partition thermodynamics due to the competing electrostatic and vdW contributions of molecular solvation further complicates the situation [ 59 , 60 ]. From hundreds of solvation/partition data, we summarize that the scaling factor of 0.8 serves as a near-optimal solution generally applicable to most ILs [ 59 , 60 ], which is somehow consistent with electrostatic potential (ESP) analysis in isolated and small clusters [ 61 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations