The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.inoche.2021.109120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular modeling of indazole-3-carboxylic acid and its metal complexes (Zn, Ni, Co, Fe and Mn) as NO synthase inhibitors: DFT calculations, docking studies and molecular dynamics simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The energy gap was computed using the Δ E = ( E LUMO − E HOMO ) 19 formula, and Fig. 3 displays the FMO representation.…”
Section: Dft Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy gap was computed using the Δ E = ( E LUMO − E HOMO ) 19 formula, and Fig. 3 displays the FMO representation.…”
Section: Dft Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The molecules with highest HOMO values can act as electron donors and the molecules with lowest LUMO can be the electron acceptors [14][15][16][17][18] The HOMO and LUMO energies and global reactivity parameters have been calculated for all the molecules 8a-8z using GAUSSIAN 09 for DFT calculation 6-31 + G (d,p) basis set and the obtained data has been given as Table .1 in the supportive information. Out of all the compounds evaluated, compounds 8a, 8c, and 8s had the biggest energy gap (Table 1) The energy gap was computed using the ΔE = (E LUMO -E HOMO ) [19] formula, and Fig. 3 displays the FMO representation.…”
Section: Dft Studymentioning
confidence: 99%