1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6823(1999)7:3<125::aid-roi1>3.0.co;2-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular markers as prognostic factors for local recurrence and radioresistance in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
1
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
0
24
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While this system is adequate in predicting group responses to treatment, there is significant variability between individual patients within any particular stage. Although there have been a number of laboratory studies on radioresistance in early laryngeal cancer, at present there are no predictive molecular markers in routine use (Smith and Haffty 1999;Yoo et al, 2000;Cho et al, 2004;Nix et al, 2004a, b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this system is adequate in predicting group responses to treatment, there is significant variability between individual patients within any particular stage. Although there have been a number of laboratory studies on radioresistance in early laryngeal cancer, at present there are no predictive molecular markers in routine use (Smith and Haffty 1999;Yoo et al, 2000;Cho et al, 2004;Nix et al, 2004a, b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the molecular heterogeneity seen within individual diagnostic categories has meant that no potential marker identified thus far has proven to be a sufficiently strong indicator of treatment response or prognosis. 7,8 Disease staging is largely based on anatomic considerations gained from clinical examination and imaging techniques. Differences in treatment response and outcome of patients with stagematched tumors suggest that the current staging systems are limited in their ability to predict locoregional control and survival for head and neck cancer patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] These tumors often display features associated with an aggressive disease phenotype and intrinsic radioresistance, which could account for this high rate of local treatment failure. 4 Because there is an established dose-response relationship in these tumors, escalating the radiation dose may improve tumor control and treatment outcomes. This has previously been difficult to implement with conventional radiotherapy techniques because of the increased risk of radiation-induced toxicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%