Cereal Genomics
DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-2359-6_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Maps in Cereals: Methodology and Progress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 258 publications
(91 reference statements)
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the slight underestimation of chiasma number, the size should rather be between 2400 and 3000 cM. Wheat genetic maps that were developed initially were smaller than expected (1700-1800 cM; for a review see Varshney et al 2004). However, these maps covered only poorly the whole genome with sometimes chromosomes that were not represented (Cadalen et al 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Considering the slight underestimation of chiasma number, the size should rather be between 2400 and 3000 cM. Wheat genetic maps that were developed initially were smaller than expected (1700-1800 cM; for a review see Varshney et al 2004). However, these maps covered only poorly the whole genome with sometimes chromosomes that were not represented (Cadalen et al 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This is particularly relevant for rye, for which, at present, the genetic maps in the public domain involve RFLP, AFLP, RAPD, and SSR loci Philipp et al 1994;Senft and Wricke 1996;Korzun et al 2001;Bednarek et al 2003;Khlestkina et al 2004Khlestkina et al , 2005. None of these maps have a significant marker density (Varshney et al 2004).…”
Section: Development Of Functional Snp Markers For Ryementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has a nuclear genome, which is replete with gene duplicates and reiterated, noncoding DNA (Devos et al 1993;Devos and Gale 2000;Alkhimova et al 2004;Schulman et al 2004;Varshney et al 2004) and which is 64 times the size of the compact genome of A. thaliana. To assay the extent of similarity of meiosis in these two divergent plant species, and to relate any differences to vastly different genome architectures, it was decided to focus upon the expression and recruitment of meiosis-specific proteins associated with the SC, a structure that may be considered a paradigm for the assembly and interaction of structural and recombinogenic proteins.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%