2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-18601-2_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Mapping of Grapevine Genes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 247 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Collard et al [53] have suggested that the difference in chromosome recombination events occurred during sexual reproduction in each subpopulation can be the reason for the variation in map length. It also has been suggested that the very large map length may probably result from the low quality of markers or difficulty in ordering abundant markers in small populations with low recombination [54]. We were not sure about the reasons for the large length of the maps constructed in this work.…”
Section: Genetic Mapmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Collard et al [53] have suggested that the difference in chromosome recombination events occurred during sexual reproduction in each subpopulation can be the reason for the variation in map length. It also has been suggested that the very large map length may probably result from the low quality of markers or difficulty in ordering abundant markers in small populations with low recombination [54]. We were not sure about the reasons for the large length of the maps constructed in this work.…”
Section: Genetic Mapmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Collard et al [53] have suggested that the difference in chromosome recombination events occurred during sexual reproduction in each subpopulation can be the reason for the variation in map length. It has been also suggested that the very large map length may probably result from the low quality of markers or difficulty in ordering abundant markers in small populations with low recombination [54]. We were not sure about the reasons for the large length of the maps constructed in this work.…”
Section: Genetic Mapmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Twenty LGs were found, because two sets of SSRs belonging to the same chromosome were kept separated, indicating low recombination information; from previous literature, we know that these SSRs map on LG7 (Doligez et al, 2006). The consensus map length was 1,028.95 cM, therefore within the "reference" range between 1,000 and 1,500 cM for Vitis map length (Vezzulli et al, 2019). SSR physical location was derived from Genoscope using the reference genome of PN40024 (Jaillon et al, 2007); for SSRs missing in Genoscope, BLAT alignment analyses were performed against the same reference genome.…”
Section: Traitmentioning
confidence: 86%