2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12041-022-01365-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular mapping of CLCuD resistance introgressed from synthetic cotton polyploid in upland cotton

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S‐12 is known for its good lint quality, late maturity and high yield potential (Imran et al, 2011) but is extremely susceptible to CLCuD (Hussain et al, 2012). All the plants in the F1 hybrid population were tolerant to CLCuD, implying that there may be a dominant gene(s) conferring resistance to CLCuD, as reported earlier (Ahuja et al, 2007; Khan, 2013; Vij et al, 2022). Various studies have reported that major genes control resistance against CLCuD.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…S‐12 is known for its good lint quality, late maturity and high yield potential (Imran et al, 2011) but is extremely susceptible to CLCuD (Hussain et al, 2012). All the plants in the F1 hybrid population were tolerant to CLCuD, implying that there may be a dominant gene(s) conferring resistance to CLCuD, as reported earlier (Ahuja et al, 2007; Khan, 2013; Vij et al, 2022). Various studies have reported that major genes control resistance against CLCuD.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Various molecular markers have been employed to create genetic linkage maps in cotton, which produced high‐density linkage maps with a marker span reaching 5115.16 cM and an average marker interval of 0.5–1 cM (Gu et al, 2020; Zhang et al, 2019). Some studies are available to map CLCuD resistance through QTL mapping using intra‐ and interspecific crosses (Vij et al, 2022). Among different molecular markers available, random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers could not show any polymorphism in the F2 segregating population (Rahman et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas S-12 is a high yielding, widely cultivated but a CLCuD-susceptible variety. All the plants in the F1 hybrid population were resistant to CLCuD, implying that resistance to CLCuD is a dominant trait, as reported earlier(Ahuja et al 2007;Khan 2013;Vij et al 2022). Various studies have reported that major genes control resistance against CLCuD.…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…Some reports have demonstrated that a single dominant gene contributes to CLCuD resistance, while others have shown that two or even three genes may contribute to CLCuD resistance in different sources of upland cotton germplasm. The reason for this foregoing dissension may be attributed to different parental populations employed in the genetic analysis(Vij et al 2022). It is factual that the dominant mode of resistance against geminiviruses has a narrow genetic base and is vulnerable to the constantly evolving geminiviruses(Vidya et al 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While pedigree research revealed that several cultivars were created through interspecific hybridization, a molecular study using isozymes and DNA markers revealed that the Upland cotton gene pool is rather uniform. Rare alleles are found in just a few closely related cultivars within a germplasm group and are thought to have evolved by introgression [6,104]. Furthermore, none of these G. barbadense -introgressed alleles were discovered in current cotton cultivars, suggesting that the advantages of G. barbadense introgression in Upland cotton are still completely unmet.…”
Section: Gene Introgression and Inter-specific Hybridizationmentioning
confidence: 99%