2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevapplied.13.054075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular-Level Exploration of the Structure-Function Relations Underlying Interfacial Charge Transfer in the Subphthalocyanine/ C60 Organic Photovoltaic System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that both the timescale and kinetics of the ππ *→CT1 transition are strongly conformation-dependent can be viewed as a structure–function relation, where the molecular structure (triad conformation) is seen to have a rather dramatic effect on the function (the CT rate). Thus, the triad provides a relatively simple demonstration for the potential importance of such structure–function relations in more complex systems, such as the correlation between interfacial structure and interfacial CT rates in OPV materials. ,, …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fact that both the timescale and kinetics of the ππ *→CT1 transition are strongly conformation-dependent can be viewed as a structure–function relation, where the molecular structure (triad conformation) is seen to have a rather dramatic effect on the function (the CT rate). Thus, the triad provides a relatively simple demonstration for the potential importance of such structure–function relations in more complex systems, such as the correlation between interfacial structure and interfacial CT rates in OPV materials. ,, …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LSC NE-FGR and IMT open the door to the investigation of nonequilibrium effects on CT and energy transfer rates in many systems of current technological and biological interest, including confined molecular systems, condensed-phase systems, and semiconductor interfaces . Work on such extensions is underway and will be reported in future publications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability to calculate charge-transfer (CT) rate constants in a complex molecular condensed-phase system accurately and reliably is key for quantitative modeling of many systems with biological and technological importance. One reason why modeling CT in such complex systems is challenging is the need to combine multiple methodologies, each of which calls for making choices based on the trade-off between accuracy and computational feasibility . This includes the choice of an electronic structure method, the method used for assigning partial charges, and force fields (e.g., polarizable vs. nonpolarizable) …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, we proposed a systematic way to account for the motion of the environment by performing the all-atom MD simulations for the entire system with an explicit environment after ab initio calculation of MD-sampled structures. , The CT rate constant was derived from the linearized semiclassical Fermi’s golden rule (LSC FGR), whose Marcus level of approximation is given by where Γ is the electronic coupling between the donor (initial) and acceptor (final) electronic states, ℏ is the reduced Planck’s constant, ⟨ U ⟩ and σ U 2 are the ensemble average and corresponding variance of the donor–acceptor energy gap U ( R ) = V D ( R ) – V A ( R ), respectively. Here, V D/A ( R ) is the donor- or acceptor-state potential energy surface and R is the nuclear configuration of the entire system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, we proposed a systematic way to account for the motion of the environment by performing the all-atom MD simulations for the entire system with an explicit environment after ab initio calculation of MD-sampled structures. 17,21 The CT rate constant was derived from the linearized semiclassical Fermi's golden rule (LSC FGR), whose Marcus level of approximation is given by 22 i k j j j j j y…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%