2017
DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2016.11.01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular landscape and sub-classification of gastrointestinal cancers: a review of literature

Abstract: Abstract:The historical approach of diagnosing cancer types based entirely on anatomic origin and histologic features, and the "one-size-fit-all" therapeutic approach, are inadequate in modern cancer treatment. From decades of research we now know that cancer is a highly heterogeneous disease driven by complex genetic or epigenetic alterations. The advent of various high throughput molecular tools has now enabled us to view and sub-classify each cancer type based on their distinct molecular features, in additi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, we focused on selected genes with known relevance for tumor initiation and progression as well as tumor suppressive function (Figure 4A). In this analysis and in accordance with the human counterpart, MLH1 -/- -associated tumors harbor additional mutations in PIK3CA , BRAF and/or KRAS and ERBB3 (16). Therefore, we created an oncoprint of the non-synonymous alterations in this selected gene set (Figure 4A).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Next, we focused on selected genes with known relevance for tumor initiation and progression as well as tumor suppressive function (Figure 4A). In this analysis and in accordance with the human counterpart, MLH1 -/- -associated tumors harbor additional mutations in PIK3CA , BRAF and/or KRAS and ERBB3 (16). Therefore, we created an oncoprint of the non-synonymous alterations in this selected gene set (Figure 4A).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…A large number of biomarkers involved in transcriptional, and post-transcriptional regulation via methylation and phosphorylation, have been implicated in cancer development ( Blee, Gray & Brook, 2015 ). However, the findings related to GC are not consistent, and specific targets for the diagnosis and treatment of GC require confirmation ( Fakhri & Lim, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, there is a great interest in deciphering the molecular pathways associated with its progression and prognosis. Environment and lifestyles are general risk factors for GC, but interaction of diet with multiple genetic and epigenetic alterations also occur during GC development [ 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ]. Proteomics provided consistent information in revealing proteome alterations associated with GC, dissected some of the mechanisms underlying gastric cancerogenesis, and enabled the identification of several diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%