2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.02.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular interactions of the type 1 human immunodeficiency virus transregulatory protein Tat with N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor subunits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But instead Tat-induced toxicity could be blocked by pharmacological blockers of NMDA receptor, which also suggests that the interactions of Tat with NMDA receptor are specific. These findings are consistent with studies showing that Tat can be colocalized to the NMDA receptor by immunostaining on the cell surface of neurons (Chandra et al, 2005) and suggest that the binding properties of Tat are specific for the NMDA receptor.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…But instead Tat-induced toxicity could be blocked by pharmacological blockers of NMDA receptor, which also suggests that the interactions of Tat with NMDA receptor are specific. These findings are consistent with studies showing that Tat can be colocalized to the NMDA receptor by immunostaining on the cell surface of neurons (Chandra et al, 2005) and suggest that the binding properties of Tat are specific for the NMDA receptor.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…suggests that Tat may act at another site on the NMDA receptor (Chandra et al, 2005). In modeling the interactions of Tat with the NMDA receptor we considered the possibility that a large ligand such as Tat protein might anchor itself to the cell membrane and then Cys31 might interact with the receptor to activate it.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interactions of Tat with neuronal membrane-bound receptors play an essential role in the mechanism of Tat neurotoxicity (Strijbos et al, 1995;Wallace et al, 2006(a,b); Chandra et al, 2005). Previous studies in different cell culture models have focused on the role of NMDA receptor-controlled pathways in the mechanism of Tat neurotoxicity (King et al, 2006;Perez et al, 2001;Wang et al, 1999;Magnuson et al, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study showed that clade B Tat exerts a neurotoxic effect on rat hippocampal neurons by binding zinc and thus reversing zinc antagonism of NMDAR, thereby potentiating NMDA-mediated excitotoxic cell death. 23 In another study, both clade B and clade C Tat were shown to be similarly secreted from infected cells and that both clades of Tat bind NMDAR with the same efficiency, but induce different levels of excitotoxicity. 28 Interestingly, the intact C30C31 motif found in clade B Tat was shown to be critical for exciting the NMDAR, whereas the C31S mutation, found in over 90% of clade C Tat proteins, significantly attenuated this neurotoxic response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…14,15 In studies of clade B Tat, it is unknown whether it is released by infected cells in situ or is transported across the blood-brain barrier, 16 but it is detectable within the brains of infected individuals [17][18][19][20] where it has neurotoxic consequences. 13,[21][22][23][24][25][26] Indeed, a single intraventricular injection of clade B Tat leads to pathologies observed in HAD, namely, macrophage infiltration, progressive glial activation, and neuronal cell death. 27 The effect of clade B Tat on neuronal apoptosis is thought to be dependent on Tat binding the lipoprotein-related protein receptor and activating the Ca 2þ -permeable N-methyl-daspartate (NMDA) receptors (NMDAR).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%