2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00595-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular interactions in collagen and chitosan blends

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
237
0
8

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 451 publications
(283 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
13
237
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Further investigations involving electron spin resonance, spin trapping, solid state nuclear magnetic resonance and infrared spectroscopy are needed to elucidate the molecular mechanism underlying the bonding between chitosan films and tissue using green lasers. 35 The outcome of the pressure test is in agreement with the above results, as seen in Figures 5b and c; the burst pressure of the nanostructured adhesive (28.0 ± 5.2 kPa) was 26% higher than the flat adhesive when laser irradiated (20.8 ± 2.6 kPa; Po0.001, Bonferroni post-test, two-way ANOVA, n = 15). There was no statistical difference between the burst pressure of the nanostructured and flat adhesives without laser activation (2.2 ± 0.5 and 1.3 ± 0.3 kPa, respectively; P40.05, Bonferroni post-test, two-way ANOVA, n = 15).…”
Section: Gecko-inspired Bioadhesive Sj Frost Et Alsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Further investigations involving electron spin resonance, spin trapping, solid state nuclear magnetic resonance and infrared spectroscopy are needed to elucidate the molecular mechanism underlying the bonding between chitosan films and tissue using green lasers. 35 The outcome of the pressure test is in agreement with the above results, as seen in Figures 5b and c; the burst pressure of the nanostructured adhesive (28.0 ± 5.2 kPa) was 26% higher than the flat adhesive when laser irradiated (20.8 ± 2.6 kPa; Po0.001, Bonferroni post-test, two-way ANOVA, n = 15). There was no statistical difference between the burst pressure of the nanostructured and flat adhesives without laser activation (2.2 ± 0.5 and 1.3 ± 0.3 kPa, respectively; P40.05, Bonferroni post-test, two-way ANOVA, n = 15).…”
Section: Gecko-inspired Bioadhesive Sj Frost Et Alsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…2). The absorption bands around 1647 cm -1 , 1542 cm -1 , and 1244 cm -1 represented the amide I, II, and III bands of gelatin, respectively (Sionkowska et al 2004). The absorption band of a Schiff base is located at approximately 1620 cm -1 (Cai et al 2011), which is similar to that of the amide I band of gelatin.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Crosslinked Gelatinmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Adding hydrophobic non polar additives to cationic surfactant solutions is also found to increase the micellar growth [44,45]. There are many evidences for an entangled micellar phase in several aqueous cationic detergent systems in the presence of added salt [46][47][48][49]. The presences of neutral salts [50][51][52][53] showed a marked shift in phase transitions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%