2016
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.179234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Imaging of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Current Status and Future Directions

Abstract: Learning Objectives: On successful completion of this activity, participants should be able to (1) summarize the main clinical features of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors; (2) describe the specific mechanisms of uptake of radiotracers and identify the relation of imaging phenotype with site of origin and tumor grade; and (3) recommend the best imaging modalities across the different tumor subtypes for imaging and for selecting candidates for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
106
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(82 reference statements)
2
106
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Sensitivities were calculated for patients and for involved anatomical regions. The differences in sensitivity between the imaging procedures were compared using the chi test and Fisher's exact test when n was <5, according to Hawass et al…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Sensitivities were calculated for patients and for involved anatomical regions. The differences in sensitivity between the imaging procedures were compared using the chi test and Fisher's exact test when n was <5, according to Hawass et al…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These tumours may be diagnostically challenging since primary or secondary lesions can be millimetric in size. Furthemore, it is known that anatomic imaging can fail to locate these extremely small tumours, especially those located in the midgut . The role of imaging is to provide the most comprehensive and precise evaluation at initial staging and re‐staging of NETs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…111 In-pentetreotide (Octreoscan) has been widely used for NET imaging, but is limited by its low image resolution and long scan duration and relatively lower SSTRs affinity[8]. In contrast, the 68 -Gallium ( 68 Ga)-DOTA-compounds recently introduced into clinical practice ( 68 Ga-DOTATATE, 68 Ga-DOTANOC, 68 Ga-DOTATOC), have been shown to have higher sensitivity for detecting NET than Octreoscan[9] and significantly impact the management of patients with NET [10,11]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SRS provides for scanning of the whole body and allows detection of metastases outside of the abdominal region. Furthermore, SRS can offer functional information based on the levels of somatostatin receptor expression and contributes to selection of appropriate candidates for somatostatin-based therapies (33). However, SRS is limited by the expression of somatostatin receptors.…”
Section: Functional Imaging Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%