2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-010-1569-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular imaging in cancer treatment

Abstract: The success of cancer therapy can be difficult to predict, as its efficacy is often predicated upon characteristics of the cancer, treatment, and individual that are not fully understood or are difficult to ascertain. Monitoring the response of disease to treatment is therefore essential and has traditionally been characterized by changes in tumor volume. However, in many instances, this singular measure is insufficient for predicting treatment effects on patient survival. Molecular imaging allows repeated in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
82
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 173 publications
0
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For several malignancies, including colorectal cancer, 18 F-FDG PET/CT examination is today recommended for preoperative staging and detection of recurrence (3)(4)(5)(6), and there is growing research attention to expanding the use of 18 F-FDG PET/CT in evaluating the response of metastatic disease (7)(8)(9)(10). To create the reproducibility that is needed for comparison of response rates between trials, the use of 18 F-FDG PET/CT in the setting of metastatic disease requires a fundamental standardization and consensus on response quantification methodology (11)(12)(13). Otherwise, the potential benefit for patients and for anticancer drug development could be lost.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For several malignancies, including colorectal cancer, 18 F-FDG PET/CT examination is today recommended for preoperative staging and detection of recurrence (3)(4)(5)(6), and there is growing research attention to expanding the use of 18 F-FDG PET/CT in evaluating the response of metastatic disease (7)(8)(9)(10). To create the reproducibility that is needed for comparison of response rates between trials, the use of 18 F-FDG PET/CT in the setting of metastatic disease requires a fundamental standardization and consensus on response quantification methodology (11)(12)(13). Otherwise, the potential benefit for patients and for anticancer drug development could be lost.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VEGF/VEGFR antibodies have been labeled with various radioisotopes for the imaging of VEGFR expression in various disease models (20). For example, extracellular VEGF imaging was accomplished by coupling anti-VEGF monoclonal antibodies (bevacizumab, HuMV833) with 89 Zr (21,22), 111 In (23), and 124 I (24).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can also reveal more in-depth information on the boilogy of tissue cells that are closer to the essence of life, including those involved in processes such as metabolism, proliferation, angiogenesis and gene expression. The use of molecular imaging not only helps improve the accuracy of early diagnosis of a tumor, but can also provide the necessary early clinical evidence of metastasis and prediction of efficacy of a particular therapy at the molecular level [1][2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%