2020
DOI: 10.3390/molecules25122764
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Image-Based Prediction Models of Nuclear Receptor Agonists and Antagonists Using the DeepSnap-Deep Learning Approach with the Tox21 10K Library

Abstract: The interaction of nuclear receptors (NRs) with chemical compounds can cause dysregulation of endocrine signaling pathways, leading to adverse health outcomes due to the disruption of natural hormones. Thus, identifying possible ligands of NRs is a crucial task for understanding the adverse outcome pathway (AOP) for human toxicity as well as the development of novel drugs. However, the experimental assessment of novel ligands remains expensive and time-consuming. Therefore, an in silico approach with a wide ra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
(164 reference statements)
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, MCC Test values obtained in this study are noticeably higher than in the study by Idakwo et al [ 34 ] (0.29, 016, 0.62, and 0.55) and for endpoint no. 3 in Uesawa et al [ 45 ] being 0.5 and 0.48 for two cases of dichotomization of toxicity of endpoint SR-MMP (Stress response panel - mitochondrial membrane potential). The comparison of our results with the corresponding models developed by other methodologies [ 31 , 33 , 34 , 37 ] by the BA gives analogous results ( Table S3 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, MCC Test values obtained in this study are noticeably higher than in the study by Idakwo et al [ 34 ] (0.29, 016, 0.62, and 0.55) and for endpoint no. 3 in Uesawa et al [ 45 ] being 0.5 and 0.48 for two cases of dichotomization of toxicity of endpoint SR-MMP (Stress response panel - mitochondrial membrane potential). The comparison of our results with the corresponding models developed by other methodologies [ 31 , 33 , 34 , 37 ] by the BA gives analogous results ( Table S3 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the search for new therapy alternatives, male predominance is one of the important features which requires the consideration of the AR as a pharmacological target [ 82 ]. Nuclear receptors consist of a superfamily of proteins that includes receptors for steroids (androgens, estrogens, glucocorticoids, progesterone) and non-steroid receptors (thyroid hormones, vitamin D, retinoids, farnesoids, and others such as the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors); steroids modulate (directly or indirectly by activation of their receptors) several key molecules, such as UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs), GATA3 zinc-finger transcription factor, FOXO1 forkhead transcription factor, CD24 cell adhesion molecule, β-catenin key component for Wnt signaling pathway, ELK1 transcription factor, ATF2 leucine zipper transcription factor, and NF-kB transcription factor [ 111 , 112 ].…”
Section: Bladder Cancer Therapiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lee et al 110 predicted in vitro pulmonary toxicity using high throughput imaging and AI, accurately classifying a number of chemicals with 89% balance accuracy, 85% sensitivity and 93% specificity. Other researchers, such as Yuan et al 111 used DL to predict toxicity through stress response effects and nuclear receptor effects, whereas Matsuzaka and Uesawa 112 used molecular image‐based DL to anticipate chemical compounds that can cause dysregulation of endocrine signaling pathways, to name but a few. Lagares et al 113 used a counter‐propagation ANN (CP ANN) based on 2D molecular descriptors, to develop an in silico multiclass classification model capable of predicting the probability of a compound to interact with P‐gp, which is highly important in the early stages of toxicological assessment during drug discovery, because of its role in defense against toxicants in the body.…”
Section: Ai‐based Toxicity Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%