2015
DOI: 10.1590/1519-6984.14813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular identification of Trichogramma species from regions in Brazil using the sequencing of the ITS2 region of ribosomal DNA

Abstract: The objective of this work was the identification and differentiation of Trichogramma exiguum Pinto and Platner species, T. pretiosum Riley, and T. galloi Zucchi using sequences of the ITS2 region of ribosomal DNA. After extracting DNA from the studied species, a PCR reaction was performed, where the amplified samples were subjected to sequencing. The sequences obtained were submitted to a similarity search in GenBank (NCBI -National Center for Biotechnology Information) using the BLAST program, aiming to dete… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For eukaryotes, there are two internal transcribed spacers (ITS1 and ITS2), highly repetitive sequences that are removed after DNA transcription 20 , 21 . ITS1 is located between 18S rDNA and 5.8S rDNA, whereas ITS2 is located between 5.8S rDNA and 28S rDNA 22 , 23 . As with 5.8S rDNA, 18S rDNA, and 28S rDNA, ITS2 displays high conservation within a species but significant variation among species; this characteristic makes this gene suitable for use as a molecular marker for identification and phylogenetic analysis in many species 22 , 24 , 25 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For eukaryotes, there are two internal transcribed spacers (ITS1 and ITS2), highly repetitive sequences that are removed after DNA transcription 20 , 21 . ITS1 is located between 18S rDNA and 5.8S rDNA, whereas ITS2 is located between 5.8S rDNA and 28S rDNA 22 , 23 . As with 5.8S rDNA, 18S rDNA, and 28S rDNA, ITS2 displays high conservation within a species but significant variation among species; this characteristic makes this gene suitable for use as a molecular marker for identification and phylogenetic analysis in many species 22 , 24 , 25 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen et al (2010Chen et al ( , 2013 first presented a medicinal plant DNA barcoding identification system, with ITS2 as the core and psbA-trnH as the supplement, using a large number of samples and comprehensive screening of DNA barcodes. The potential for ITS2 to identify species has recently been confirmed, and this DNA fragment has been applied to various medicinal plants and materials (Han et al, 2013;Hou et al, 2013aHou et al, ,b, 2014aRichardson et al, 2015;Santos et al, 2015). Based on these studies, we collected samples of Achyranthis Bidentatae Radix and its adulterants to rapidly and correctly distinguish this medicinal plant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In extensive inventories in the Americas, dozens of parasitoids were found to be associated with SAW 21 . Among these, Telenomus remus (Nixon) (Hymenoptera: Platygastridae) and Trichogramma pretiosum (Riley) (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) were discovered to be the most important naturally occurring egg parasitoids 22,23 . In addition to the egg parasitoids, the egg‐larval and larval parasitoids Chelonus insularis (Cresson) and Cotesia marginiventris (Cresson) (both Hymenoptera: Braconidae) emerged among the most frequent natural enemies and have also proven to be efficient against SAW 24 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 21 Among these, Telenomus remus (Nixon) (Hymenoptera: Platygastridae) and Trichogramma pretiosum (Riley) (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) were discovered to be the most important naturally occurring egg parasitoids. 22 , 23 In addition to the egg parasitoids, the egg‐larval and larval parasitoids Chelonus insularis (Cresson) and Cotesia marginiventris (Cresson) (both Hymenoptera: Braconidae) emerged among the most frequent natural enemies and have also proven to be efficient against SAW. 24 These parasitoid species co‐evolved with SAW and may be potentially relevant for long‐term management of the pest in areas of invasion or locations with risks of spread.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%