2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.nurx.2006.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular genetics of addiction vulnerability

Abstract: Summary:Classical genetic studies document strong complex genetic contributions to abuse of multiple addictive substances, to mnemonic processes that are likely to include those involved in substance dependence, and to the volumes of brain gray matter in regions that are likely to contribute to mnemonic/ cognitive and to addictive processes. The working idea that these three heritable phenotypes are likely to share some of the same complex genetic underpinnings is presented. This review contains association-ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(28 reference statements)
1
33
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, some of these polymorphisms and haplotypes have been associated with altered NrCAM expression in human postmortem brain samples 9. Although potentially important neurobiological roles of NrCAM have been reported in animal studies,9,10 few studies have focused on human subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, some of these polymorphisms and haplotypes have been associated with altered NrCAM expression in human postmortem brain samples 9. Although potentially important neurobiological roles of NrCAM have been reported in animal studies,9,10 few studies have focused on human subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twin studies estimate the heritability of traits, whereas association studies examine specific polymorphisms in relation to a phenotype. We will not include family-based linkage studies of drug abuse or animal studies on genetic determinants of stimulant effects, both which have been carefully reviewed elsewhere (Phillips et al 2008; Kreek et al 2005; Uhl 2006). We will also not discuss the stimulant caffeine, because it acts by distinct neurochemical mechanisms and because we have recently reviewed the genetics of caffeine elsewhere (Yang et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of cocaine users (up to 90%) report co-administering EtOH during cocaine binges (Brookoff et al, 1996; Magura and Rosenblum, 2000). The high prevalence of co-abuse of alcohol with cocaine in humans has been postulated to be predicated upon both a common genetic factor that predispose an organism to abuse multiple substances, including alcohol, and the interaction of the drugs within the organism (Uhl 2004, 2006; Uhl et al, 2008). Individuals predisposed to abuse alcohol and other drugs of abuse are disproportionally reactive to alcohol and other drugs of abuse when given alone, and co-administration of alcohol and other drugs of abuse result in further divergence (Schuckit 1994a,b; Kareken et al, 2010; Uhl 2008; Piazza and LeMoal 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%