2016
DOI: 10.4238/gmr.15028040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular genetic map construction and QTL analysis of fruit maturation period in grapevine

Abstract: ABSTRACT. In this study, we aimed at finding the genetic regularity of grape maturation period. Early-maturing grapevine, "87-1", was used as the female parent and late-maturing, "9-22", as the male parent, to create an F1 hybrid population. A total of 149 individual plants and their parents were selected as the mapping population. Sequencerelated amplified polymorphism and simple-sequence repeat analyses were performed. We performed a linkage analysis and constructed a molecular genetic map. In the obtained m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the position of this trait differs between previous studies and Duchêne et al 39 ., although all are located on chromosome 16. CMa3, one of the QTLs related to grape maturation period, was detected on chromosome 16 near the marker UDV052 based on a hybrid (F1) population in which an early-maturing female parent “87-1” was crossed with a late-maturing male parent ‘9-22’ 40 . Zyprian et al 24 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the position of this trait differs between previous studies and Duchêne et al 39 ., although all are located on chromosome 16. CMa3, one of the QTLs related to grape maturation period, was detected on chromosome 16 near the marker UDV052 based on a hybrid (F1) population in which an early-maturing female parent “87-1” was crossed with a late-maturing male parent ‘9-22’ 40 . Zyprian et al 24 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detection of QTLs in grapes has mostly been used to investigate the genes associated with various complex traits, such as resistance to diseases and blights like powdery and downy mildew and Pierce's disease (Fischer et al 2004, Barker et al 2005, Merdinoglu et al 2005, Riaz et al 2006, 2009, 2011, Welter et al 2007, Hoffmann et al 2008, Bellin et al 2009, Marguerit et al 2009, Zhang et al 2009, Blasi et al 2011, Moreira et al 2011). It has also been used to search for genes related to quality traits such as berry size and seedlessness (Doligez et al 2013, Cabezas et al 2006, Mejía et al 2007, 2011, Costantini et al 2008), phenology (Duchêne et al 2012, Grzeskowiak et al 2013), anthocyanin concentration and tannins (Fournier‐Level et al 2009, Huang et al 2012), aroma (Eibach et al 2003, Battilana et al 2009, Duchêne et al 2009), fertility (Doligez et al 2010), bunch architecture (Correa et al 2014), firmness (Correa et al 2016, Jiang et al 2020) as well as timing and duration of flowering, veraison and ripening (Fischer et al 2004, Costantini et al 2008, Marguerit et al 2009, Zhao et al 2016). Recently QTLs related to sugar and organic acid concentration in grape have been reported using different types of populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GWAS analyses have also been already performed for quality traits (Laucou et al, 2018) and early ripening (Xu et al, 2016). Studies concerning all aspects of its cultivation including disease resistance (Blasi et al, 2011; Rex et al, 2014; Pap et al, 2016), quality traits in berries (Cabezas et al, 2006; Chen et al, 2015; Yang et al, 2016); growth and reproductive traits (Houel et al, 2015; Zhao et al, 2016), yield and agronomic traits such as adaptation to water deficit and lime induced iron chlorosis (Viana et al, 2013; Coupel-Ledru et al, 2014) and, particularly, the adaptation of grapevine varieties to a climate change scenario (Duchene et al, 2012), have been carried out. To this respect, GWAS studies along with the analysis of population structures have shown that LD in the domesticated grapevine is low, even at short ranges, but persists above background levels, set around 3 kb (Myles et al, 2010; Nicolas et al, 2016).…”
Section: Selection Of Improved Cultivarsmentioning
confidence: 99%