“…Two competing hypotheses regarding the origin of this group have recently been put forward: one suggests a Far East Asian origin (Wang et al ., ; Bing et al ., ); the other suggests a Gondwanan one (Almeida et al ., ; Peris et al ., ). In support of the Far East Asia hypothesis is the fact that the greatest species diversity is found in this area given the sampling efforts so far: all species in the group have been uncovered here, with S. mikatae and S. arboricola not yet reported elsewhere (Naumov et al ., 1997; 2000; 2013; Wang and Bai, ; Wang et al ., ; Almeida et al ., ; Bing et al ., ). In addition, the genetic diversity of S. eubayanus , S. paradoxus , S. kudriavzevii and S. cerevisiae are the same or higher in Far East Asian populations than elsewhere (Tsai et al ., ; Hittinger et al ., ; Bing et al ., ).…”