“…The use of GCMC sampling has been found to significantly improve the accuracy of ligand binding free energy calculations, where displaced waters that are not expelled sufficiently quickly from the binding site can have a serious impact on the free energy results, when using conventional sampling methods. ,,, However, the acceptance rates for unbiased and instantaneous particle insertions and deletions in condensed phases are typically very low, with around 1 in every 10,000 moves attempting to insert/delete water molecules to/from a bulk water system being accepted . A number of enhanced sampling techniques have been developed to improve the acceptance rates of GCMC, including cavity biasing, continuous fractional component Monte Carlo, configurational biasing, and molecular exchange approaches . Here, we investigate the use of nonequilibrium switching to enhance the acceptance rates and, in turn, the efficiency of GCMC moves.…”